SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
THE MANAGEMENT OF RASHTREEYA SIKSHANA SAMITHI TRUST – Appellant
Versus
DR. T. N. LOKESH – Respondent
WP/27529/2018



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA

WRIT PETITION NO.27529/2018 (S – RES)

BETWEEN

THE MANAGEMENT OF

RASHTREEYA SIKSHANA SAMITHI TRUST

R.V.TEACHERS’ COLLEGE BUILDING,

2ND BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,

BENGALURU-01

REPRESENTED BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY,

MR. A.V.S.MURTHY ….. PETITIONER

(By SHRI ANAND K R., ADVOCATE)

AND

DR. T. N. LOKESH

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,

S/O LATE N. NAGAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

’SHIVAKRUPA’,

HANUMANTHPUR BUS STOP,

KUVEMPUNAGAR,

TUMAKURU

CURRENTLY RESIDING AT

C/O MUNIAPPA,

SIDDESWARASWAMY KRUPA,

BEHIND GOVERNMENT SCHOOL

KODAGI TIRUMALAPURA,

2

HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, T.B.POST,

BENGALURU – 560 089.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SHRI ABIJITH HARANAHALLI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R )

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET

ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER MAEAT 11/17ON IA NO.1

ANNEXURE-H DATED 24.04.2018 PASSSED ON I.A.NO.1 ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING

IN

‘B’

GROUP,

THIS

DAY

THROUGH

VIDEO

CONFERENCE THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw writ

petition in view of the fact that the respondent who had initiated

proceedings before the Educational Appellate Tribunal in appeal

MA.EAT.11/2017 has withdrawn the appeal, pursuant to which,

the respondent is taken back to duties and continuing to work

with the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid developments the writ petition is

dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Psg*

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top