SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI MULIMANI
M/S. GOTAWAT INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

WRIT PETITION.NO.11358 OF 2014 (LB-RES)

BETWEEN

M/S. GOTAWAT INDUSTRIES,

NO.232, SOMPURA 1ST STAGE,

KIADB I.A,

THYAMAGONDLU,

MAKANAKUPPE VILLAGE,

NELAMANGALA TALUK,

BANGALORE RURAL-562 132.

REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER

SRI SUSHIL JAIN.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI BASAVARAJ V. SABARAD, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.

THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,

MANNE GRAMA PANCHAYAT,

NELAMANGALA TALUK,

TYAMAGONDLU HOBLI,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

2.

THE TALUK PANCHAYAT,

NELAMANGALA,

BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS

2

(SRI B. M. HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING CERTAIN

RELIEFS.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Sri. Basavaraj V. Sabarad, learned counsel for

petitioner and Sri B. M. Halaswamy, learned counsel

for

respondents

have

appeared

through

video

conferencing.

2.

It is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top