HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P.B.BAJANTHRI
MOHIUDDIN SHARIFF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/6992/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
Crl.P. No.6992/2018
BETWEEN:
1.
Mohiuddin Shariff
Aged about 46 years
s/o Abdul Raheem
No.25, 2nd Main Kousar
Nagar, R T Nagar
Bengaluru-560032.
2.
Md.Shakeel Rahman
@ Mohammed Shakil
Aged about 51 years
s/o Abdul A K Shareef
No.23, 1st Cross, Kousar
Nagar, Dinnur, R T Nagar
Bengaluru-560 032.
3.
Tayab ur Rahman
Aged about 50 years
s/o Parveez, No.29/A
5th Cross, Rehmath
Nagar, R T Nagar
Bengaluru-560032.
4.
Musheer Ahmed
Aged about 43 years
s/o Basheer Ahmed
No.69/75, 3rd Main
Kousar Nagar, R T Nagar
Bengaluru – 560032.
… Petitioners
(By Sri Naveed Ahmed, Advocate)
2
AND:
1.
State of Karnataka
Through R T Nagar P S
Bengaluru-560032
Rep. by SPP, High Court
Bengaluru-1.
2.
Siddiq, aged about 68 years
s/o Abdul Salam, No.92/1
3rd Cross, Kousar Nagar
R T Nagar, Bangalore-32.
.
... Respondents
(By Sri R D Renukaradhya, HCGP for R1)
This criminal petition is filed under 482 of Cr.PC
praying to quash the complaint at Annexure-A, FIR at
Annexure-B and final report (charge sheet) at Annexure-
C and thereby the proceedings in Criminal Case i.e. CC
No.5523/2018 pending on the file of the LVI Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Bengaluru (56
CMM) for the offences u/S.323, 325, 341 and 506 r/w
149 of IPC.
This petition is coming on for admission this day,
the Court made the following:-
ORDER
In the instant petition, petitioners have sought for
the following relief:
(A)
Quash
the
complaint
at
Annexure-A FIR in Cr.316/2017 at
Annexure-B and Final Report (Charge
Sheet) at Annexure-C and thereby the
proceedings in Criminal Case i.e CC
No.5523/2018 pending on the file of
the
LVI
Addl.
Chief
Metropolitan
3
Magistrate Court, Bengaluru (56 CMM)
for the offences u/Sec.323, 325, 341
and 506 R/w 149 IPC in the interest of
justice and equity.
2.
Learned
counsel
for
the
petitioners
submitted that having regard to the nature of
allegations alleged in the complaint, the offences
punishable under Sections 323, 341, 325, 506 read
with Section 149 of IPC are not attracted. Hence, the
FIR
and
consequential
charge
sheet
in
CC
No.5523/2018 pending on the file of the LVI Additional
CMM, Bangalore (56 CMM) are liable to be set aside.
Under Section 482 of Cr.PC, scope is very limited. Apex
Court from time to time held that under what
circumstances, petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC
could be entertained. One of the ingredient is that the
allegations would fall under particular offence or not.
On reading of complaint in the present petition, it is
evident that the offence punishable under Section 323
of Cr.PC is attracted. In view of the fact that
complainant was beaten by the accused. Further
wound certificate dated 23.1.2018 has been placed on
4
record by the learned State Counsel. There were six
injuries mentioned in the wound certificate. In this
regard, the doctor has opined that they are simple in
nature except injury No.2, which is grievous in nature.
Having regard to these facts and circumstances, petition
under Section 482 of Cr.PC is not maintainable.
Accordingly, petition stands dismissed reserving liberty
to the petitioner to make a necessary application for
discharge in accordance with law.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Bkm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.