HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K. NATARAJAN, J
M BHASKARA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WP/2565/2007
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
WRIT PETITION No.2565 of 2007 (SC/ST)
BETWEEN
M. BHASKARA REDDY,
SON OF MALLA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
4/1, MUNISWAMAPA LAYOUT,
SWAMY VIVEKANANDA ROAD,
ULSOOR,
BANGALORE – 560 008.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI ABINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI N.S. SANJAY GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE DISTRICT,
BANGALORE.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION,
BANGALORE.
3.
SMT. MUNIVENKATAMMA
SINCE DEAD BY HER LRs.,
3(a). YELLAPPA,
SON OF LATE LAKSHMAIAH,
MAJOR,
2
3(b). MUNISWAMY,
SON OF LATE LAKSHMAIAH,
MAJOR,
3(c). SMT. MUNIYAMMA,
DAUGHTER OF LATE LAKSHMAIAH,
MAJOR,
(SINCE DEAD BY LRs)
3(c)(i) SOMASHEKAR,
S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
3(c)(ii) PURUSHOTHAMA,
S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
3(c)(iii) BALARAJA,
S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
3(c)(iv) KUMAR,
S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF
CHIKKABASAVANAPURA,
VIRGONAGAR POST,
KRISHNARAJPURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
3(d). SMT. MUNIYAMMA,
WIFE OF MUNIKRISHNA, MAJOR,
3(e). MANJU,
SON OF LATE MUNIKRISHNA,
RESPONDENTS No.3(a) TO (e) ARE
RESIDING AT
CHIKKABASAVANAPURA,
VIRGONAGAR POST,
3
KRISHNARAJPURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, HCGP for R1 & R2;
SRI B.K. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE for R3(c)(i to iv);
SRI SRIHARI A.V., ADV FOR R3 (a,b,d,e)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
ORDERS
DATED
25TH
SEPTEMBER
2006
(ANNEXURE-D) PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN SC.ST (A)
40 of 2005-2006 AND ALSO THE ORDERS DATED 25TH MAY
2005 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN K. SC.ST.20 of
2004-2005 (ANNEXURE–C) AND CONSEQUENTIALLY REJECT
THE CLAIM OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR RESUMPTION AND
DECLARE THAT SECTION 4(2) OF ACT 2 of 1979 CAN BE MADE
APPLICABLE ONLY IN RESPECT OF GRANTED LANDS WHOSE
STIPULATED FOR NON-ALIENATION HAS NOT YET EXPIRED AS
ON 01.01.1979.
THIS WRIT
PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND
RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 11.10.2019 AND COMING ON
FOR PRONOUNCEMENT, THIS DAY THE COURT PRONOUNCED
THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this petition challenging the
order dated 25.05.2005 passed by respondent No.2-
Assistant Commissioner in K.SC.ST.20/2004-05 which was
confirmed
by
respondent
No.1-Special
Deputy
Commissioner in SC.ST(A) 40/2005-06 vide order dated
25.09.2006.
4
2.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner,
learned counsel for the respondents as well as learned
High Court Government Pleader.
3.
The case of respondent No.3-Munivenkatamma
before the Assistant Commissioner is that the land in
Sy.Nos.24 & 25 of Basavanapura village, measuring 1 acre
20 guntas has been granted to her on 12.03.1979 as per
Annexure-A. As per Annexure-B, the Government also
issued Saguvali Chit on 19.04.1979. The respondent No.3
was in possession of the said land. Subsequently, the
said land was sold by respondent No.3 to one Masthan
Khan on 21.03.1994, who in turn sold the said land to
R.Keshava on 21.03.1996. Thereafter, the said Keshava
sold a portion of the land to an extent of 22 guntas to the
present petitioner M.Bhaskara Reddy on 23.09.1996 and
sold the remaining land to other two persons under
different sale deeds. Based upon the sale deed dated
23.09.1996, the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment
of the land and subsequently, the legal heirs of the
5
deceased Munivenkatamma filed an application under
Section 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands)
Act, 1978, (‘PTCL Act’ for short) before
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.