SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT
SRI. APPAJAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. K. MANJUNATH – Respondent


Heard learned counsel Sri.Bharath Kumar V for

petitioner through video conference, learned counsel

Sri.Gouthamdev C.Ullal for respondent No.1 and learned

counsel Sri.M.S.Devaraj for respondent Nos.2 to 4, and

- 3 -

Sri.K.R.Nityananda,

learned

Additional

Government

Advocate for respondent No.5. Perused the writ petition

papers.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

in pursuance of the decree in O.S.No.487/2013, the

petitioner got rectified the boundary in the katha in

respect of the property bearing No.5/6, situated at

Gangavara Chowdappanahalli village, Devanahalli taluk,

Bangalore Rural District. The katha shows Appajappa’s

property to the East in the changed katha. Aggrieved by

the said changed katha, respondent No.1 approached the

second respondent in Appeal No.12/2018-19. The appeal

filed by respondent No.1 was allowed by order dated

08.01.2020 (Annexure-K) on the ground that the sale

deed under which, the petitioner had purchased the

property showed road on the eastern side. Aggrieved by

the said order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the 5th

respondent.

The

5th

respondent

by

order

dated

01.02.2021 dismissed the appeal confirming the order

- 4 -

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top