HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT
SRI. APPAJAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. K. MANJUNATH – Respondent
Heard learned counsel Sri.Bharath Kumar V for
petitioner through video conference, learned counsel
Sri.Gouthamdev C.Ullal for respondent No.1 and learned
counsel Sri.M.S.Devaraj for respondent Nos.2 to 4, and
- 3 -
Sri.K.R.Nityananda,
learned
Additional
Government
Advocate for respondent No.5. Perused the writ petition
papers.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
in pursuance of the decree in O.S.No.487/2013, the
petitioner got rectified the boundary in the katha in
respect of the property bearing No.5/6, situated at
Gangavara Chowdappanahalli village, Devanahalli taluk,
Bangalore Rural District. The katha shows Appajappa’s
property to the East in the changed katha. Aggrieved by
the said changed katha, respondent No.1 approached the
second respondent in Appeal No.12/2018-19. The appeal
filed by respondent No.1 was allowed by order dated
08.01.2020 (Annexure-K) on the ground that the sale
deed under which, the petitioner had purchased the
property showed road on the eastern side. Aggrieved by
the said order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the 5th
respondent.
The
5th
respondent
by
order
dated
01.02.2021 dismissed the appeal confirming the order
- 4 -
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.