SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
J.M.KHAZI
MR G MURALI – Appellant
Versus
MR SURENDRA KUMAR – Respondent
CRL.A/1234/2019



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1234 OF 2019

BETWEEN:

MR. G. MURALI,

S/O. LATE GIRIRAJ,

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

R/AT NO.4, 15TH STREET,

JOGUPALYA, HALASURU

BENGALURU – 560 008.

... APPELLANT

(BY SRI. S.V.MANJUNTHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )

AND:

MR. SURENDRA KUMAR,

S/O. LATE J. SRINIVAS,

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

PROPRIETOR, UNIQUE PROVIDERS,

R/AT NO.4/1, 15TH STREET,

JOGUPALYA, ULSOOR,

BENGALURU – 560 008.

...RESPONDENT

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION

378(4) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

JUDGMENT AND ORDER AND SENTENCE OF ACQUITAL

ORDER

DATED

03.06.2019

PASSED

BY

THE

LVIII

A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU, ACMM-58, IN

C.C.NO.

55213/2016

ACQUITING

THE

RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 138 OF

THE N.I. ACT.

2

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The appellant's counsel is absent today. On

31.07.2021 also the appellant's counsel was

absent. On 31.07.2021, though finally one week

time

was

granted

for

compliance

of

office

objections, till today the office objections have

not been removed. This appeal is posted today

for non-compliance of office objections for fifth

time. It appears that the appellant is not

interested.

Appeal

is

dismissed

for

non-

prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SV

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top