SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

- 1 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2017 (MV-D)

C/W

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3356 OF 2016(MV-D)

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1629 OF 2017(MV-D)

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4784 OF 2017(MV-D)

IN MFA NO.21/2017

BETWEEN:

THE BRANCH MANAGER

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.,

DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR,

NO.2, N.S.C. BOSE ROAD,

CHENNAI-01, TAMIL NADU STATE.

REPRESENTED BY ITS LOCAL BRANCH:

THE REGIONAL MANAGER,

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED., REGIONAL OFFICE

UNIT NO.4, GOLDEN HIGHT COMPLEX,

RAJAJINAGAR,BANGALORE CITY.

BY IT S SENIOR MANAGER-CLAIMS

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. O MAHESH., ADVOCATE)

R

Digitally signed

by PAVITHRA B

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

- 2 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

AND:

1.

SMT GOWRAMMA

AGE 46 YEARS,

W/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA

2.

KUM: DIVYA,

AGED 25 YEAR

D/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA

3.

SRI. DILIP KUMAR

AGE 23 YRS

S/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA

4.

KUM. BHAVYA

AGE 21 YEAR

D/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA

ALL R/A DUMMIKOPPALU,

DODDAMAGGE HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK,

PRESENTLY R/A FORT, MARIGUDI STREET,

CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN, 573116.

5.

SRI. AVINASH

MAJOR,

S/O THAMMEGOWDA @

MARITHAMMEGOWDA,

RESIDING AT DUMMI VILLAGE,

MARITHAMMANAHALLI POST,

DODDAMAGGE HOBLI,

ARAKALAGUD TALUK 573102.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. HALESHA R G, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R4 ., R5-SERVED)

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED24.9.2016 PASSED IN MVC

NO.539/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF

- 3 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

RS.12,70,000/- WITH INTERST @ 9% P.A FROM THE DATE OF

PETITION TILL THE DATE OF REALIZATION.

IN MFA NO.3356/2016

BETWEEN:

THE GENERAL MANAGER

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED

DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR

NO.2, N H C N S C BOSE ROAD

CHENNAI-600001.

BY

THE REGIONAL MANAGER

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

REGIONAL OFFICE

GOLDEN HEIGHT COMPLEX

6TH FLOOR, 59TH C CROSS

4TH M MAIN, RAJAJINAGAR

BANGALORE-560010

BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER-CLAIMS

…APPELLANT

(BY

SRI.

O

MAHESH.,

ADVOCATE

(THROUGH

VIDEO

CONFERENCE)

AND:

1.

SIDDALINGAMMA

W/O NANJUNDASWAMY

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

2.

NANJUNDASWAMY

S/O NANJAPPA

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT

MOOLEKALENAHALLI VILLAGE

- 4 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

KASABA HOBLI

HOLENARASIPURA TALUK

HASSAN DISTRICT-573201.

3.

AVINASH

S/O THIMMEGOWDA

MAJOR

R/O DUMMIMARITHAMMANAHALLI POST

DODDAMAGGE HOBLI

ARKALGUDU TALUK

HASSAN DISTRICT-573201

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, R3-

NOTICE HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DT:3/2/21)

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 02.03.2016 PASSED IN MVC

NO.378/14 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC,

HOLENARASIPUR,

AWARDING

COMPENSATION

OF

RS.6,65,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 9% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF

PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSIT.

IN MFA NO.1629/2017

BETWEEN

1.

SMT GOWRAMMA

W/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

2.

KUMARI DIVYA

D/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

3.

SRI. DILIPKUMAR

D/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA,

- 5 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

4.

KUM BHAVYA

D/O LATE DEVARAJEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,

ALLA ARE R/AT DUMMIKOPPALU

DODDAMAGGE HOBLI,

ARAKALAGUD TALUK

PRESENTLY R/AT FORT, MARIGUDI STREET,

CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. HALESHA R G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI AVINASH

S/O THAMMEGOWDA @

MARITHAMMEGOWDA, MAJOR,

R/AT DUMMI VILLAGE,

MARITHAMMANAHALLI POST,

DODDAMAGGE HOBLI,

ARAKALAGUD TALUK

2.

THE MANAGER

CHOLAMANDALAM GEN., INS., CO., LTD.,

DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR, NO.2

N.S.C.BOSE ROAD,

CHENNAI-01, TAMIL NADU STATE

REPD. BY ITS LOCAL BRANCH,

THE REGIONAL MANAGER,

REGIONAL OFFICE,

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,

UNIT NO.4, GOLDEN HIGHT COMPLEX,

RAJAJINAGAR,

BANGALORE CITY

…RESPONDENTS

- 6 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

(BY SRI. O MAHESH FOR R2 ., ADVOCATE FOR R2 (THROUGH

VIDEO CONFERENCE)

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24/09/2016 PASSED IN MVC

NO.539/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &

J.M.F.C., CHANNARAYAPATNA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM

PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT

OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA NO.4784/2017

BETWEEN:

1.

SIDDALINGAMMA

W/O LATE NANJUNDASWAMY

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

2.

NANJUNDASWAMY

S/O LATE NANJAPPA

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

THE BOTH APPELLANTS ARE

R/AT MOOLEKALENAHALLI VILLAGE

KASABA HOBLI

HOLENARASIPURA TALUK

HASSAN DISTRICT- 573201.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE ., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE REGIONAL GENERAL MANAGER

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INS. CO.LTD

DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR

NO.2, N H C N S C BOSE ROAD

CHENNAI-600001.

REPRESENTED BY

THE REGIONAL GENERAL MANAGER

- 7 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL

INSURANCE CO. LTD.

REGIONAL OFFICE

GOLDEN HEIGHT COMPLEX

NO.59TH CROSS

RAJAJINAGAR

BENGALURU-560 010.

2.

AVINASH

S/O THIMMEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

R/AT DUMMIMARITHAMMANAHALLI POST

DODDAMAGGE HOBLI

ARAKALGUD TALUK

HASSN DISTRICT-573201.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. O MAHESH FOR R1., ADVOCATE FOR R1 (THROUGH

VIDEO CONFERENCE, R2-NOTICE DISPENSED WITH V/O

DATED:15-03-2021)

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:02.03.2016 PASSED IN MVC

NO.378/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, &

JMFC, MACT, HOLENARASIPURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE

CLAIM

PETITION

FOR

COMPENSATION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING,

THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

- 8 -

MFA No. 21 of 2017 C/W

MFA No. 3356 of 2016

MFA No. 1629 of 2017

MFA No. 4784 of 2017

These appeals are filed under Section-173(1) of the

Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘MV

Act’ for brevity).

MFA No.21/2017 (MVC No.539/2014) is filed by the

appellants-insurance company challenging the judgment

and

award

dated

24.09.2016,

passed

in

M.V.C.No.539/2014, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge,

Channarayapatna, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’

for brevity) questioning the liability as well as quantum of

compensation.

MFA No.3356/2016 (MVC No.378/2014) is filed by

the

appellant-insurance

company,

challenging

the

judgment and award dated 02.03.2016, passed in

M.V.C.No.378/2014, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge,

- 9 -

MACT, Holenarasipura, questioning the liability fixed as

well as the quantum of compensation.

MFA No.1629/2017 (MVC No.539/2014) is filed by

the appellant-claimant, challenging the judgment and

award dated 24.09.2016, passed in M.V.C.No.539/2014,

on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Channarayapatna,

(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’ for brevity)

seeking enhancement of compensation.

MFA No.4784/2017 (MVC No.378/2014) is filed by

the appellant-claimant, challenging the judgment and

award dated 02.03.2016, passed in M.V.C.No.378/2014,

on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, MACT, Holenarasipura,

seeking enhancement of compensation.

- 10 -

Brief facts:

On 22.11.2013 at about 6.00 p.m., when the

deceased M.N.Raghu was going in a motor cycle bearing

registration No.KA-13-V-4832 to Temple, on the left side

of the road, in a moderate speed, the driver of a goods

Ape auto bearing registration No.KA-13-B-3520, drove the

same in a rash and negligent manner with high speed and

dashed against the motor cycle of the deceased. As a

result of which, both the rider of the motor cycle as well as

the passenger traveling in the goods auto-rickshaw

sustained severe injuries and died.

4. Hence, a claim petition was filed by the claimants

under Section-166 of the M.V. Act, claiming compensation

for the death of the deceased in the road traffic accident.

The Tribunal on appreciating the materials on

record, allowed MVC No.539/2014 in part, and awarded a

- 11 -

compensation of Rs.12,70,000/- along with interest at 9%

per annum from the date of petition till the date of

deposit. The Tribunal held respondent – insurance

company liable to pay the compensation.

6.

The Tribunal on appreciating the materials on

record, allowed MVC No.378/2014 in part, and awarded a

compensation of Rs.6,65,000/- along with interest at 9%

per annum from the date of petition till the date of

deposit. The Tribunal held the owner and insurer are

jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation.

ON LIABILITY AS WELL AS RASH AND NEGLIGENT

ASPECT:

7.

The learned counsel for the insurance company

- appellant submitted that the accident was caused on

account of rash and negligent driving of the deceased who

was riding the motor cycle. Further, submitted that the

deceased was occupant of Devarajegowda, who died in the

- 12 -

accident was traveling in the auto-rickshaw as a gratuitous

passenger. Therefore, the insurance company is not liable

to pay the compensation. Further submitted that as per

the Registration Certificate, Exhibit-R7 extract, the seating

capacity of the auto-rickshaw is one which is only for

driver. Therefore, the deceased who was driving the auto-

rickshaw is a gratuitous passenger. Therefore, the

insurance company is not liable to pay the compensation.

8.

Further, submitted that the auto-rickshaw is a

transport vehicle. But the driver of the auto-rickshaw was

holding Driving License to drive LMV (Non-Transport

Vehicle). Therefore, the insurance company is liable to be

exonerated on the violation of condition of this policy.

Further, submitted that there is no evidence to prove that

the deceased has traveled along with goods. Therefore,

the deceased was gratuitous passenger. Hence, the

insurance company is not liable to pay the compensation.

- 13 -

9.

On the other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top