HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
P DILIP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/3694/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3694 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
P.DILIP KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
S/O M.V.PAPANNA
R/AT NO.47, 14TH A CROSS
THIGALARA PALYA MAIN ROAD
RAGHAVENDRANAGAR, KARIOBANAHALLI
BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU – 560 058
... PETITIONER
[BY SRI.TUMBIGI PRABHUGOUDA
BASAVANTARAYAGOUDA, ADVOCATE]
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PEENYA POLICE STATION
BENGALURU REP BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU – 560 001
... RESPONDENT
[BY SRI. SHOWRI H.R, HCGP]
* * *
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF
CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE
EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.9/2021 OF PEENYA P.S., BENGALUR
CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 20(B)(II)(b) OF NDPS ACT AND
SEC.25(I)(B)(b) OF NDPS ACT AND SE.25(i)(B)(b) of ARMS ACT AND
SEC.399 AND 402 OF IPC.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned High
Court Government Pleader for respondent-State.
2.
This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C by
accused No.4 in Crime No.9/2021 of Peenya Police Station
registered for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of
IPC and Sections 20(B)(II)(b) of NDPS Act, 1985 and Sections
25-1(B)(b) of Arms Act, 1959.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that the police sub-
inspector of Peenya Police Station received a credible information
on 15.01.2021 at about 12.15 p.m., that about 9 to 10 persons
have assembled near Karihobanahalli Nilagiri Planatation holding
weapons and they are in possession of ganja. Immediately, he
secured the panch witnesses and went to the spot along with his
staff. They noticed 3 two wheelers parked at the spot and about
9 persons armed with weapons. On seeing them 6 of the
accused fled away and they apprehended 3 accused. It is the
further case of prosecution that from accused No.1, 30 grams of
ganja and a long and from accused No.2, 25 grams of ganja and
3
a long and from accused No.3, 35 grams of ganja was seized.
Further, a plastic bag containing 1kg 900 gram of ganja and a
Deo motorcycle bearing Registration No.KA-01-HU-9635 was also
seized. It is alleged that the arrested accused revealed the
names of the other accused persons who ran away from the
spot, including the name of the petitioner.
4.
The learned counsel for petitioner contends that
entire allegations against the petitioner are false. He submits
that the petitioner was not at all present at the spot at the time
of incident on the other hand on 12.01.2021 he had traveled to
Goa from Bengaluru and returned only on 18.01.2021. Copies of
the online tickets are annexed to the petition.
5.
Learned High Court Government Pleader contends
that the petitioner is a habitual offender and therefore in the
event of grant of anticipatory bail he may once again involve in
similar offences and also flee from justice.
6.
According to the prosecution accused Nos.1 to 3
were apprehended at the spot and certain recoveries were made
at their instance. It is not in dispute that on the basis of
statement of the co-accused the petitioner has been arraigned as
4
an accused in this case. The allegations against the petitioner
have to be established in the course of trial. Keeping in view the
submission made by the learned counsel for petitioner and
considering the facts and circumstances, relief sought by the
petitioner can be granted by imposing suitable conditions. Hence,
the following
ORDER
Criminal petition is allowed.
Petitioner/ accused No.4 shall be released on bail in the
event of his arrest in Crime No.9/2021 of Peenya Police Station,
registered for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of
IPC and Sections 20(B)(II)(b) of ND