HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI S V RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/21828/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION No.21828/2014(S – DE)
C/W
WRIT PETITION No.21829/2014(S – DE)
WRIT PETITION No.31117/2014(S – DE)
IN WRIT PETITION No.21828/2014(S – DE)
BETWEEN
SRI S.V.RAMESH
S/O P.VENKATACHALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD,
KOTTANUR DINNE SUB-DIVISION,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI K.SATHISH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.S.BHAGWAT,
ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING))
AND
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
2
2.
THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,
M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU - 01.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.M.C.NAGASHREE, AGA FOR R1 (PHYSICAL
HEARING);
SMT.A.D.VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2
(VIDEO CONFERENCING))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDERS;
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.7.11.2013 PASSED
BY
R-1
(ANNEX-A)
AND
ARTICLES
OF
CHARGE
DTD.5.4.2014 ISSUED BY R-2 (ANNEX-B).
IN WRIT PETITION No.21829/2014 (S – DE)
BETWEEN
SRI S.V.RAMESH
S/O P.VENKATACHALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD,
KOTTANUR DINNE, SUB-DIVISION,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI K.SATHISH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.S.BHAGWAT,
ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING))
AND
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
3
2.
THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,
M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 01.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.M.C.NAGASHREE, AGA FOR R1 (PHYSICAL
HEARING);
SMT.A.D.VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (VIDEO
CONFERENCING))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDERS;
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.20.6.2013 PASSED
BY
R-1
(ANNEX-A)
AND
ARTICLES
OF
CHARGE
DTD.19.8.2013 ISSUED BY R-2 (ANNEX-B).
IN WRIT PETITION No.31117/2014 (S – DE)
BETWEEN
SRI L.KUMAR NAIK
S/O LATE LACHCHA NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
WEST-1 SUB-DIVISION, B.W.S.S.B.
R.P.C. LAYOUT, HAMPI NAGAR,
BENGALURU – 560 004.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI K.V.NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE (VIDEO
CONFERENCING))
AND
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
4
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,
M.S.BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.M.C.NAGASHREE, AGA FOR R1 (PHYSICAL
HEARING);
SRI VENKATESH S.ARABATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R2
(PHYSICAL HEARING))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED
GOVERNMENT ORDER AND ARTICLES OF CHARGE DATED
1.2.2012 AND 9.10.2012 VIDE ANN-A & B RESPECTIVELY;
QUASH THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 1.2.2012
PASSED BY R-1 VIDE ANN-A, AS WELL AS ARTICLES OF
CHARGE
DATED
9.10.2012
VIDE
ANN-A
&
B
RESPECTIVELY PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANN-B.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND
RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 01.02.2021, COMING ON
FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING :-
ORDER
The petitioners in all these writ petitions have
called in question the order of entrustment of enquiry to
the hands of the second respondent Lokayukta and
5
consequential issuance of charge sheet on the strength
of the said order of entrustment by the Lokayukta, on
different grounds.
2. In Writ Petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.