HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P.B.BAJANTHRI
SRI. RAMACHANDRA SITILLAYA – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR – Respondent
WP/7846/2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
WRIT PETITION NO.7846/2015 (GM-R/C)
BETWEEN:
SRI.RAMACHANDRA SITILLAYA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
S/O SRI.SUBRAMANYA SITTILAYA,
ARCHAKA
SHREE PANCHAJANYA NILAYA
POST: KINYA – 575 023,
NEAR SREE DURGAPARAMESHWARI TEMPLE
THALAPADY,MANGALURU TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SUMANTH M.S., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.S.RAJENDRA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR
HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS &
CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS
DAKSHINA KANNADA
MANGALURU – 575 001
DAKSHINA KANNADA.
2.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER
HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS &
CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS
D.C.COMPOUND,DAKSHINA KANNADA
MANGALURU – 575 001
DAKSHINA KANNADA
3.
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE
2
SREE DURGAPARAMESHWARI TEMPLE
THALAPADY – 575 023
MANGALURU TALUK,DAKSHINA KANNADA.
4.
SRI.GANESH BHAT
S/O SRI.BALAKRISHNA BHAT
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
LAKSHMI KRUPA
DEVI NAGAR,PANJALA
POST: KINYA – 575 023
MANGALURU TALUK
DAKSHINA KANNADA.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SREEDHAR N.HEGDE, HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2;
SRI.M.VISHWAJITH RAI & SRI.K.N.JAYAPRAKASH,
ADVOCATE FOR R-3 & R-4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & 2
TO RECOGNIZE THE PETITIONER AS A PRADHANA ARCHAK OF THE
TEMPLE ON HEREDITARY BASIS ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’
GROUP THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING/ PHYSICAL HEARING
(OPTIONAL), THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the
following relief:
(i)
Directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to
recognize the petitioner as a Pradhana Archak of the
temple on hereditary basis.
(ii)
Forebear
the
respondent
No.4
from
performing pooja in the temple as an Pradhana Archak.
3
(iii)
Quash the endorsement dated 1.2.2015 in
DVS.EST.(2).CR.38/2014-15/138718/F1 issued by the
respondent No.1 (Annexure-F)
(iv)
Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court
deems fit to grant.
2.
The impugned endorsement dated 01.02.2015 is
continuation of Pradhana Archak to Sri. Durga Parameshwari
Temple, Talapadi, Devipura, Mangaluru Taluk, D.K.District, is
taken note of that Ganesh Bhat was continued as Pradhana
Archak with a rider that he has to obtain necessary qualification
prescribed for the post of Archaka. For acquisition of
qualification, time limit has been stipulated as 5 years appointing
him as Pradhana Archak on regular basis.
3.
Learned
counsel
for
petitioner
submitted
that
petitioner is not aware ‘whether Sri. Ganesh Bhat-respondent
No.4 has acquired the requisite qualification prescribed to hold
the post of Pradhana Archak in the aforesaid temple or not?’
4.
Prima facie, the present petition does not survive for
consideration in view of the fact that Sri. Ganesh Bhat-
respondent No.4 was asked to continue for a period of five years
4
with effect from 01.02.2015 and in the event of acquisition of
required qualification prescribed for the post of Pradhana Archak,
then his service would be made permanent.
5.
Learned counsel for respondent No.4 on instruction
submitted that he has acquired requisite qualification to hold the
post of Pradhana Archak and it is submitted to the Deputy
Commissioner, D.K. District, Mangaluru.
6. The Deputy Commissioner, D.K.District, Mangaluru is
hereby
directed
to
furnish
details
about
acquisition
of
qualification by respondent No.4 to the petitioner along with a
copy of the order, if any, giving permanent status to respondent
No.4 so as to enable the petitioner to question the same before
the competent forum. The aforesaid material information be
furnished to petitoner within a period of four weeks from today.
Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
pgg