SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.S.MUDAGAL
LOKESHA @ ANDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


CRL.R.P.60.2017

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021

BEFORE:

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. MUDAGAL

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.60/2017

BETWEEN:

1

LOKESHA @ ANDAR

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

SON OF. PUTTASWAMY

2

CHIKKARAJU

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

SON OF. KARIGOWDA

PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 ARE

R/AT ADAKANAHALLIHUNDI VILLAGE

NANJANGUD TALUK

MYSURU DISTRICT – 571 301

... PETITIONERS

[BY SRI, P. NATARAJU, ADV.]

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY NANJANAGUD RURAL POLICE STATION

MYSURU DISTRICT

REPRESENTED BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT BUILDING

BENGALURU – 560 001

… RESPONDENT

[BY SRI, R.D. RENUKARADHYA, HCGP]

CRL.R.P.60.2017

2

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 OF

CR.PC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND

ORDER DATED 5.12.2016 PASSED BY THE III ADDL.

SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU IN CRL.A.NO.161/2016 AND

THE JUDGMENT ANDORDER DATED 2.8.2016 PASSED BY

THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD IN

C.C. NO.1033/2012 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONERS BY

ALLOWING THIS CRL. RP.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

O R D E R

“Whether

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top