HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B.VEERAPPA,V SRISHANANDA
SMT. AKKAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. CHIKKAMMA – Respondent
RFA/151/2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
R.F.A.NO.151/2016 (PAR)
BETWEEN
1 . SMT. AKKAMMA
AGED 60 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRI.THIMMAIAH,
DAUGHTER OF LATE AKKAVVA,
RESIDENT OF
KANANUR PALYA VILLAGE,
MARASANDRA POST,
KUDUR HOBLI,
MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-561 101.
2 . SMT. RADHA
AGED 42 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRIDHARAMURTHY,
DAUGHTER OF LATE SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF
SIDDAGANGAIAHNAPALYA VILLAGE,
KALLEYA POST,
MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-561 101.
3 . SRI. K.R. UMASHANKARA
AGED 40 YEARS,
SON OF LATE SIDDAGANGAMMA,
2
RESIDENT OF KALASIPALYA VILLAGE,
MADAKEHALLI POST,
KOTTAGERE HOBLI,
KUNIGAL TAKLUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
4 . SMT. BHAGYALAKSHMI
AGED 38 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRI. VENKATESH,
DAUGHTER OF SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF KALASIPALYA VILLAGE,
MADAKEHALLI POST,
KOTTAGERE HOBLI,
KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
5 . SMT. K.R. GEETHA
AGED 36 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRI. RAMADASAIAH,
DAUGHTER OF SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF KEMPANAHALLI VILLAGE,
MAYAGANAHALLI POST,
BIDADI HOBLI,
RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT-561 101.
6 . SRI. K.R. REVANNA
AGED 34 YEARS,
SON OF LATE SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF KALASIPALYA VILLAGE,
MADAKEHALLI POST,
KOTTAGERE HOBLI,
KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
7 . KUMAR K.R. PANDURANGA
AGED 31 YEARS,
SON OF LATE SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF KALASIPALYA VILLAGE,
MADAKEHALLI POST,
KOTTAGERE HOBLI,
3
KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
8 . KUMAR K.R. RAMAKRISHNA
AGED 29 YEARS,
SON OF LATE SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF KALASIPALYA VILLAGE,
MADAKEHALLI POST,
KOTTAGERE HOBLI,
KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
9 . KUMARI NIRMALA
AGED 24 YEARS,
DAUGHTER OF LATE SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF
KALASIPALYA VILLAGE,
MADAKEHALLI POST,
KOTTAGERE HOBLI,
KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI JAGADISH BALIGA N, ADVOCATE)
AND
1 . SMT. CHIKKAMMA
AGED 75 YEARS,
DAUGHTER OF LATE KULLAIAH,
RESIDENT OF KANANUR PALYA VILLAGE,
MARASANDRA POST-561 101,
KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS.,
R1(a) SMT.GANGAMMA
AGED 68 YEARS,
D/O SMT.CHIKKAMMA
4
WIFE OF NANJUNDAIAH
RESIDING AT KANANURE PALYA VILLAGE
MARASANDRA POST,
KUDURU HOBLI
MAGADI TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT -561 101
R1(B) SMT.MANGALAMMA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
DAUGHTER OF SMT.CHIKKAMMA
WIFE OF D.G.THIMMAIAH @ RAJANNA
RESIDING AT DONNERE VILLAGE
MARSHETTAHALLI POST
KADABA HOBLI,
GUBBI TALUK
TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 130
2 . SRI. RAMAIAH
AGED 60 YEARS,
SON OF SMT. CHIKKAMMA,
RESIDENT OF
KANANUR PALYA VILLAGE,
MARASANDRA POST-561 101,
KUDUR HOBLI,
MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
3 . SRI. K.R. SHIVANANDA
AGED 45 YEARS,
SON OF LATE SIDDAGANGAMMA,
RESIDENT OF KALASIPALYA VILLAGE,
MADAKEHALLI POST, KOTTAGERE HOBLI,
KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI NARAYAN M. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R1(a);
SRI H.V.DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1(b) SERVED;
R3 SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT)
5
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 (1) R/W ORDER
XXXLI RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 17.10.2015 PASSED IN O.S NO.382/2014
(OLD O.S NO.380/2011) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC., MAGADI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
V. SRISHANANDA. J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The unsuccessful plaintiffs are appellants herein,
challenging
the
Judgment
and
Decree
passed
in
OS.No.382/2014 (Old No.380/2011) on the file of the Senior
Civil Judge and JMFC, Magadi, whereby the suit of the
Plaintiffs came to be dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under:
The parties are referred to as per their original
rank