Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
Y M MANJESH @ MANJUNATH – Appellant
Versus
MR PRAKASH BAHI – Respondent
MFA/1261/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MFA No.1261 OF 2017(MV)
C/W
MFA No.1260 OF 2017(MV)
IN MFA 1261/2017
BETWEEN:
Y.M.MANJESH @ MANJUNATH
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
R/AT YALAVAHALLI VILLAGE
SRINIVASAPURA TALUK.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.H.JAYANTH POOJARY, ADV. )
AND
1.
MR. PRAKASH BAHI
S/O RAGHUBAHAI DHOLARIYA
MAJOR
R/AT BLOCK NO.1, ASLAY RESIDENCY
SATYASI ROAD, RAJKOT
GUJARATH-360001.
2.
M/S FUTURE GENERAL INDIA
INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
208, NATHI EDIFIC, DR. YAGNOK ROAD
2
OPP. POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE
RAJKOTE, GUJRATH.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.RAVI S SAMPRATHI, ADV. FOR R2:
R1 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF
MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
24.09.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.342/2015 ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM, MACT, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION
FOR
COMPENSATION
AND
SEEKING
ENHANCMENT OF COMPENSATION.
IN MFA 1260/2017
BETWEEN:
T.N. HARISHBABU
S/O NARAYANASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
R/AT R. THIMMASANDRA VILLAGE
SRINIVASAPURA TALUK.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.H.JAYANTH POOJARY, ADV. )
AND
1.
MR. PRAKASH BAHI
S/O RAGHUBAHAI DHOLARIYA
MAJOR
3
R/AT BLOCK NO.1, ASLAY RESIDENCY
SATYASI ROAD, RAJKOT
GUJARATH-360001.
2.
M/S FUTURE GENERAL INDIA
INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
208, NATHI EDIFIC, DR. YAGNOK ROAD
OPP. POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE
RAJKOTE, GUJRATH.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.RAVI S SAMPRATHI, ADV. FOR R2:
R1 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF
MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
24.09.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.343/2015 ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM, MACT, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION
FOR
COMPENSATION
AND
SEEKING
ENHANCMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THESE MFAs COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed
memo of even date in both the appeals stating that
4
the parties have settled the matter out of court and
hence seeks permission of the court to withdraw the
appeals.
The memo filed in both the appeals are taken on
record.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
DM
