HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DR.NAVEEN KRISHNA TARUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/11550/2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
WRIT PETITION NO.11550/2020 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
DR.NAVEEN KRISHNA TARUR,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
S/O KRISHNA RAO T S
8-10/14 BALLI COMPOUND,
B-2 CROS KODIKAL
MANGALORE - 575 006
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DR.NAVEEN KRISHNA TARUR, PARTY-IN-PERSON (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,
LABOAUR MINISTRY,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
INFOSYS LTD., 44, INFOSYS
AVENUE ELECTRONICS CITY,
HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 100
3.
MR. RAVINDER SINGH,
SENIOR INDUSTRY PRINCIPAL
CONSULTANT, INFOSYS LTD. 44,
INFOSYS AVENUE ELECTRONICS CITY,
HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 100
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y.D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R1
SRI. C.K. NANDAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. RAGHURAM CADAMBI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF
THE
CONSTITUTION
OF
INDIA
PRAYING
TO
SET
ASIDE
2
TERMINATION ORDER DT 05-SEP-2019, AS PER ANNEXURE-B AS
ILLEGAL, NULL AND VOID AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B
GROUP THROUGH
VIDEO
CONFERENCING/
PHYSICAL
HEARING
(OPTIONAL), THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Petitioner/party-in-person remained absent.
2.
In the instant petition, petitioner/party-in-person has
prayed for the following reliefs:-
a. Issue Suitable Writ reliefs thereby enabling,
in the interest of justice and equity.
b. Set aside Termination order Dt 05-sep-2019,
as per Annexure ‘B’, as illegal, null and void.
c. Reinstatement of petitioners services with
full back wages.
d. Appropriately, penalize respondent no 2 and
3 for not following provisions of Labour laws,
Natural Justice and fundamental rights, with
strict warning to maintain fair practices and
avoiding stigmatization.
e. Award Solarium of at least 3 times the
payment of notice period for having gone
through
mental
trauma
of
getting
the
employment
contract
terminated
in
10
minutes
discussion
as
terminating
employment contract at such as short notice
is not prevailing Indian culture.
f. Award
Solatium
for
infringing
upon
petitioner’s Fundamental Rights.
3
g. Pass
any
other
relief/reliefs,
orders,
directions, writs as deemed fit for grant, in
the interest and furtherance of Justice,
Humanity Fraternity and Equity.
3.
Learned counsel for respondents on instructions
submitted that petitioner/party-in-person has already invoked
alternative remedy before the jurisdictional authority in respect
of the aforesaid prayers. When he has already invoked
jurisdictional remedy, he is not entitled to have parallel
proceedings in respect of common issue.
4.
The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of reserving
liberty to the parties to urge all contentions before the
jurisdictional authority.
In view of disposal of the present petition, pending
interlocutory applications stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KPS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.