SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
LOK ADALATH
SRI DODDA THIMANNA @ T THIMMANNA – Appellant
Versus
SRI SURESH BABU – Respondent
MFA/6027/2019



1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU

BEFORE THE LOKADALAT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT

&

SRI. I.S. PRAMOD CHANDRA, MEMBER

M.F.A.No.6027/2019(MV)

(Lok Adalat No.956/2021)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. DODDA THIMANNA @ T.THIMMANNA

S/O. THIMMANNA,

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

SHEEP REARING WORK

2.

SRI. RAGHU @ T. RAGHAVENDRA,

S/O. THIMMANNA,

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

SHEEP REARING WORK

3 .

SRI. VENKATESH,

S/O. CHITHAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

SHEEP REARING WORK,

ALL PETITIONERS ARE R/AT:

KATAPPANAHATTY VILLAGE,

YARABALLY MAJURE

HIRIYUR TALUK

2

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-572 143.

...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. SATHISHA T, ADVOCATE )

AND:

1.

SRI. SURESH BABU

S/O. SUGTHANA

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

R.C. OWNER OF THE TANKER

LORRY BEARING NO.MH.04 CG-5704

R/O. ROOM NO.2 KAJU PADA

KHANNA CHAWL GHOD BUNDER ROAD,

THANE (WEST) -400601

MAHARASHTRA STATE.

2 .

THE MANAGER,

M/S BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL

INSURANCE COPMPANY LTD.,

NO.31, T.B. TOWER 1ST CROSS,

NEW MISSION ROAD,

BENGALURU-560002

NOW RESIDING AT:

THE LEGAL MANAGER

M/S. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

NO.1/2, GOLDAN HAIGHTS

4TH FLOOR, 59TH C CROSS,

4TH M BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR,

BENGALURU-560 010 .

...RESPONDENTS

(By SRI. B PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 )

3

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT

AND AWARD DATED02.04.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO.121/2013 ON

THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDITIONAL MACT,

HIRIYUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR

COMPENSATION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT

OF

COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE

LOKADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS

PASSED.

CONCILIATION ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present

through video conferencing/Physical Hearing. The learned Counsel appearing

for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are

present.

2.

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed

by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized

by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the

respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The

appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance

Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full

and final settlement of the claim.

4

3.

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said

amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of

award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A.

from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

4.

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be disbursed in favour

of the appellants – claimants in equal proportion, on proper identification.

5.

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified

accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

MEMBER

SMC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top