BETWEEN:
MR.DEEKSHITH GOWDA
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
R/AT KEMPANAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572130
…..PETITIONER
(BY SRI.HANUMANTHARAYA C.H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY AMRUTHUR POLICE STATION,
KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001
….. RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE PETITIONER-ACCUSED ON BAIL IN
S.C.NO.105/2021 OF AMRUTHUR POLICE STATION, TUMAKURU
DISTRICT IN CRIME NO.91/2021 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 376, 306, AND 417 OF IPC, 1860 PENDING ON
THE FILE OF VI ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
TUMAKURU AFTER TAKING SUFFICIENT SURETY.
2
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH VIDEO
CONFERENCING AT DHARWAD BENCH, THIS DAY, THE COURT
MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner/accused
under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’, for short) for granting
bail in respect of Crime No.91/2021 of Amruthur Police
Station, Tumakuru District for the offence punishable under
Sections 376, 306 and 417 of Indian Penal Code, 1860
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’, for short).
2.
Heard the arguments of learned counsel for
petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondent-State.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that on the
complaint of one Mudlagiri Gowda, police registered case for
the above said offences on 14.07.2021. It is alleged in the
complaint that his deceased daughter was studied up to final
year B.Com. degree and about 6-7 months back she was
suffering from injuries while riding the bike and she was
3
taken to the hospital. Afterwards, she was in the house.
Later, she was suffering from stomach pain as menstruation
was not happening. When she was taken to hospital, scanning
was done and it was revealed that she was six months
pregnant. On enquiry, deceased disclosed that petitioner
/accused was the cause for her pregnancy and she was in
love with the petitioner. Thereafter, complainant requested
petitioner to marry the deceased. The petitioner/accused said
to dogged the same under the guise that he will marry her
after her elder sister’s marriage. Subsequently, victim
requested accused to marry her as she has become pregnant.
But, accused said to have told so many problems. Thereafter,
he refused to marry and he instructed her to remove the
fetus and he will pay money and the same was heard by
father of the victim as the deceased was switched on speaker
of mobile. Thereafter, complainant was taken the help of his
friends and relatives for holding panchayath. After knowing
the same, accused abused her father in Hard tone. Hence,
she has committed suicide on 14.07.2021 by consuming
poison as well as by hanging. After conducting postmortem,
4
fetus was sent to DNA test. Result is awaited. Previous bail
petition of this petitioner was rejected on 15.12.2021 mainly
on the ground that DNA test is awaited as deceased was six
months
pregnant
when
she
committed
suicide.
Now,
petitioner is before this court on another ground.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner contended that
Police have failed to submit the DNA report even after a lapse
of 10 months from the date of registering of the crime, and
for the same reason the trial is yet to begin violating the
Fundamental Right of Fair and Speedy Trial and personal
liberty. Further, petitioners counsel contended that viscera
and other articles were sent for FSL and DNA test to Forensic
Laboratory, Bengaluru. They received the articles and given
acknowledgement that report will be given by 19.01.2023,
till another seven months is required to wait for the purpose
of getting DNA report. Investigation completed, charge sheet
has been filed. Case has been committed Court of Sessions
and Sessions Court also not able to frame the charges and
waiting for FSL and DNA test report. Learned counsel for
5
petitioner contended that postmortem examination report
does not reveal anything about the contents of fetus in the
stomach but except collecting the stomach contents nothing
is mentioned in the postmortem report about pregnancy and
petitioner is in custody for almost one year. With these
grounds counsel for petitioner prays to allow the bail petition.
5.
Per contra, learned HCGP seriously objected the
bail petition and contended that in FSL report at sl.no.1 it is
clearly mentioned that a bottle containing uterus has been
received by them. Report is awaited. However, in post
mortem examination report, it is clearly mentioned that some
contents of the stomach collected and sent for FSL which also
includes uterus. Petitioner after making the victim pregnant,
has refused to marry her after committing sexual assault on
her and cheated her. Therefore, she forc