PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
MR RAMANATHA BHAT – Appellant
Versus
SMT PRABHAVATHI – Respondent
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective
parties.
The plaintiff has filed the suit for the relief of
specific performance based on the agreement to the extent of 1
acre and out of that, based on the sale deed as well as the
Power of Attorney executed by the original owner, he has sold
- 4 -
the 30 cents of the property and remaining 20 cents of the
property, sale deed has not been executed and hence, notice
was issued and filed a suit for the relief of possession.
Defendant No.7 who is the appellant herein claimed that he is a
bonafide purchaser and he has purchased the property on
16.09.2010 to the extent of 20 cents.
The Trial Court having considered the pleadings of
both the parties framed an additional issue with regard to
whether he is a bonafide purchaser and the Trial Court also
while answering the additional issue No.1 in paragraph No.12,
taken note of admission given by the defendant No.7 that he is
aware about the previous agreement for sale and also taken
note of the further admission given by him that though aware
of the earlier agreement he felt that they are the selling the
property which is not the suit schedule property and different
property. H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.