HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
SMT NEELAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT SANNAMMA – Respondent
RFA/342/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
B E F O R E
THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.342 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SMT NEELAMMA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
W/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,
D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA,
SINCE DEAD REP. BY HER LR:
SMT. SHOBHA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
W/O SURESH,
RESIDING AT NO.9,
VINAYAKA NARASARI
NEAR RING ROAD,
BOGADI MYSORE-570 001.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. N.KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT SANNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
W/O NARAYANA @ JOGAPPA,
D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA,
2.
GOPAL
S/O SANNEGOWDA,
RFA NO.342/2016
2
3.
SMT PREMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA,
RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3 ARE
RESIDING AT RANGASAMUDRA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
T.NARASIPURA TALUK-570 001.
4.
HEMAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
D/O SANNEGOWDA,
RESIDING AT CHIKKA-ANKANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK-570 001.
5.
ASHWINI
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
6.
SUSHEELA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
D/O MARISWAMY
7.
JYOTHI
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
D/O MARISWAMY,
RESPONDENT NO.5 TO 7 ARE
RESIDING AT CHENNAHALLI VILLAGE,
ARAKERE HOBLI,
SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK-570 001.
8.
SMT BHAGYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
W/O GOVINDEGOWDA,
9.
SMT CHENNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
W/O NAGARAJU,
RFA NO.342/2016
3
RESPONDENT NO.8 TO 9 ARE
RESIDING AT RANGASAMUDRA (V)
BANNUR(H)
T.NARASIPURA TALUK-570 001.
10. SMT RATHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
W/O RAJANNA,
RESIDING AT KUPPEGALA (V)
VARUNA(H)
MYSORE TALUK-570 001.
11. SRI RAJU
S/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
12. SRI CHUNCHEGOWDA
S/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
13. SMT RENUKA
W/O MAYIGOWDA,
D/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
14. SRI KRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
S/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,
RESPONDENT NO.11 TO 14 ARE
RESIDING AT HANUMANALU VILLAGE,
BANNUR HOBLI,
T.NARASIPURA TALUK-570 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R7;
R8 TO R14 – SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
RFA NO.342/2016
4
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.07.2015 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.24/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, T.NARASIPURA, DISMISSING THE SUIT
FILED FOR PARTITION, SEPARATE POSESSION AND
MESNE PROFITS.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Learned counsel from both side present.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
seeking permission to withdraw this appeal as settled out
of Court.
In view of the memo and the supporting submissions
from both side, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
sac*
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.