SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
SMT NEELAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT SANNAMMA – Respondent
RFA/342/2016



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019

B E F O R E

THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.342 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

SMT NEELAMMA

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

W/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,

D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA,

SINCE DEAD REP. BY HER LR:

SMT. SHOBHA,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

W/O SURESH,

RESIDING AT NO.9,

VINAYAKA NARASARI

NEAR RING ROAD,

BOGADI MYSORE-570 001.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. N.KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT SANNAMMA

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

W/O NARAYANA @ JOGAPPA,

D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA,

2.

GOPAL

S/O SANNEGOWDA,

RFA NO.342/2016

2

3.

SMT PREMA

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA,

RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3 ARE

RESIDING AT RANGASAMUDRA VILLAGE,

KASABA HOBLI,

T.NARASIPURA TALUK-570 001.

4.

HEMAVATHI

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

D/O SANNEGOWDA,

RESIDING AT CHIKKA-ANKANAHALLI VILLAGE,

KASABA HOBLI,

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK-570 001.

5.

ASHWINI

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

6.

SUSHEELA

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

D/O MARISWAMY

7.

JYOTHI

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

D/O MARISWAMY,

RESPONDENT NO.5 TO 7 ARE

RESIDING AT CHENNAHALLI VILLAGE,

ARAKERE HOBLI,

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK-570 001.

8.

SMT BHAGYAMMA

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

W/O GOVINDEGOWDA,

9.

SMT CHENNAMMA

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

W/O NAGARAJU,

RFA NO.342/2016

3

RESPONDENT NO.8 TO 9 ARE

RESIDING AT RANGASAMUDRA (V)

BANNUR(H)

T.NARASIPURA TALUK-570 001.

10. SMT RATHNAMMA

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

W/O RAJANNA,

RESIDING AT KUPPEGALA (V)

VARUNA(H)

MYSORE TALUK-570 001.

11. SRI RAJU

S/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

12. SRI CHUNCHEGOWDA

S/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

13. SMT RENUKA

W/O MAYIGOWDA,

D/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

14. SRI KRISHNA

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

S/O LATE MAYIGOWDANA SIDDEGOWDA,

RESPONDENT NO.11 TO 14 ARE

RESIDING AT HANUMANALU VILLAGE,

BANNUR HOBLI,

T.NARASIPURA TALUK-570 001.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R7;

R8 TO R14 – SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)

RFA NO.342/2016

4

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER

SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.07.2015 PASSED IN

O.S.NO.24/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND JMFC, T.NARASIPURA, DISMISSING THE SUIT

FILED FOR PARTITION, SEPARATE POSESSION AND

MESNE PROFITS.

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR

ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

ORDER

Learned counsel from both side present.

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

seeking permission to withdraw this appeal as settled out

of Court.

In view of the memo and the supporting submissions

from both side, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

sac*

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top