SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
M/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS – Appellant
Versus
MR BALAN PARAVANTAVIDA – Respondent


The appellant has filed this appeal challenging the

judgment dated 24.06.2021 passed by the K-REAT1 in

Appeal No.(K-REAT) 12/2021.

2. Heard Shri H.U.Vachan, learned Advocate on

behalf of Smt.D.Kavitha, learned Advocate for the

appellant,

Shri

Amit

Anand,

learned

Advocate

for

respondent No.1 and Shri S.H.Balappa, learned Advocate

on behalf of Shri K.Rajashekhar, learned Advocate for

respondent No.2.

3. Shri Amit Anand, learned Advocate for respondent

No.1 has filed a memo of even date, which reads thus:

1 Karnataka Real Estate Appellate Tribunal

- 3 -

"MEMO ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT

It is submitted as follows:

1. On 04.02.2021, the Appellant filed an Appeal No.(K-REAT)

12 of 2021, before the Karnataka real Estate Appellate

Tribunal seeking quashing of the order dated 02.08.2018,

of the Adjudicating Officer, K-RERA.

2. On 18-03-2021, in Appeal No. (K-REAT) 12/2021, the 1st

Respondent herein filed a Memo stating that, the Appeal

is infructuous, as the 1st Respondent is not enforcing the

delay compensation award dated 02.08.2018, as he is

seeking refund of amount and compensation in Complaint

bearing No.7420/2021, pending on the files of the

Adjudicating Officer, K-RERA (ANNEX

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top