HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
G.NARENDAR
SRI. RAMACHANDRA H C – Appellant
Versus
THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED – Respondent
WP/9206/2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION No.9206/2020 (S-TR)
BETWEEN
SRI. RAMACHANDRA H C
S/O CHIKKANAGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER
OFFICE OF DIVISIONAL STORE
MADDUR DIVISION
MANDYA CIRCLE
MADDUR TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571428
R/O 2947,
KEERTHINAGARA
NEW EXTENSION, MALAVALLI TOWN
MANDYA DISTRICT 571430
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI BASAVARAJA PATEL G K, ADV.)
AND
1. THE KARNATAKA POWER
TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
CORPORATE OFFICE
KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560009
2. CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICAL
SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED (CESCOM)
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.29, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,
HINKAL, MYSORE 570017
2
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER
(ELECTRICAL) CESCOM
WORK AND MAINTENANCE CIRCLE
MANDYA DISTRICT 571401
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
(ELECTRICAL) CESCOM
WORK AND MAINTENANCE CIRCLE
MADDUR DIVISION
MADDUR,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571428
5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
(ELECTRICAL)CESCOM
WORK AND MAINTANANCE CIRCLE
MADDUR DIVISION
MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT 571428
6. THIPPESWAMY
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER
SOMANAHALLI SECTION
MADDUR,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571428
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI BASAVARAJA H.T, ADV. FOR R1,
SRI H.V.DEVARAJ, ADV. FOR R2 TO R5,
SRI M.SUBRAHMANYA BHAT, ADV. FOR R6.)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS
RELATING TO THE IMPUGNED OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM ORDER
DD 06.08.2020 VIDE ANNX-K, PASSED BY THE R-2, PERUSE TO
QUASH THE SAME AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, MALAFIDE AND IN
GROSS VIOLATION OF TRANSFER POLICY AND ARTICLE 14 AND
21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ETC.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR ‘FURTHER HEARING’ THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
A memo is preferred seeking leave of the Court to
withdraw the writ petition in view of the fact that the petitioner
has been subsequently transferred by order dated 30-09-2020.
2.
In that view of the matter, the memo is taken on
record.
3.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Rsk/-
CT-HR