SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
G.NARENDAR
SRI. RAMACHANDRA H C – Appellant
Versus
THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED – Respondent
WP/9206/2020



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR

WRIT PETITION No.9206/2020 (S-TR)

BETWEEN

SRI. RAMACHANDRA H C

S/O CHIKKANAGAIAH

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER

OFFICE OF DIVISIONAL STORE

MADDUR DIVISION

MANDYA CIRCLE

MADDUR TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT 571428

R/O 2947,

KEERTHINAGARA

NEW EXTENSION, MALAVALLI TOWN

MANDYA DISTRICT 571430

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI BASAVARAJA PATEL G K, ADV.)

AND

1. THE KARNATAKA POWER

TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED

REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

CORPORATE OFFICE

KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD,

BENGALURU 560009

2. CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICAL

SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED (CESCOM)

REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

NO.29, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,

HINKAL, MYSORE 570017

2

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER

(ELECTRICAL) CESCOM

WORK AND MAINTENANCE CIRCLE

MANDYA DISTRICT 571401

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

(ELECTRICAL) CESCOM

WORK AND MAINTENANCE CIRCLE

MADDUR DIVISION

MADDUR,

MANDYA DISTRICT 571428

5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

(ELECTRICAL)CESCOM

WORK AND MAINTANANCE CIRCLE

MADDUR DIVISION

MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT 571428

6. THIPPESWAMY

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER

SOMANAHALLI SECTION

MADDUR,

MANDYA DISTRICT 571428

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI BASAVARAJA H.T, ADV. FOR R1,

SRI H.V.DEVARAJ, ADV. FOR R2 TO R5,

SRI M.SUBRAHMANYA BHAT, ADV. FOR R6.)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS

RELATING TO THE IMPUGNED OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM ORDER

DD 06.08.2020 VIDE ANNX-K, PASSED BY THE R-2, PERUSE TO

QUASH THE SAME AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, MALAFIDE AND IN

GROSS VIOLATION OF TRANSFER POLICY AND ARTICLE 14 AND

21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ETC.

THIS WP COMING ON FOR ‘FURTHER HEARING’ THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

3

ORDER

A memo is preferred seeking leave of the Court to

withdraw the writ petition in view of the fact that the petitioner

has been subsequently transferred by order dated 30-09-2020.

2.

In that view of the matter, the memo is taken on

record.

3.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Rsk/-

CT-HR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top