SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT C KALAIVENI – Appellant
Versus
SMT LALITHA – Respondent
WP/38943/2019



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 38943/2019 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN :

SMT C. KALAIVENI

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

W/O. SRI. VADIVELU,

R/AT NO. 46,

HENRYS NEW MODEL HOUSE,

COROMANDAL POST,

KOLAR GOLD FIELDS – 563 119.

... PETITIONER

(BY SRI.C. PATTABIRAMAN., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

AND :

1.

SMT LALITHA

W/O. SRI. UPENDRA,

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

2.

SRI. UPENDRA

DEAD BY LR,

2.A

SRI KRISHNAMURTHY,

AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,

S/O. SRI. UPENDRA,

2(B). SOUNDARYA

AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS

D/O LATE SRI UPENDRA,

2

3.

SRI. SHANKAR

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

S/O. SRI. NARAYANA,

RESPONDENT NOS. 1, 2(A) AND 2(B) AND 3

ARER/AT PEDDAPALLI VILLAGE,

OORGAUM VILLAGE POST,

KOLAR GOLD FIELDS – 563 119.

... RESPONDENTS

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

QUASH THE ORDER DATED 07.08.2019 PAASED IN

I.A.NO.25 FILED IN O.S.NO.25/2008 BY THE LEARNED

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DVN) AT KOLAR GOLD FIELDS IN

SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE APPLICATION FILED

UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 9 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC AT

ANNEXURE-A AND; CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW I.A.NO.25

FILED UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 9 R/W SECTION 151 OF

CPC FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN AT ANNEXURE-E.

THIS

WRIT

PETITION

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE

THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

None appears for the petitioner though called

twice. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested

in prosecuting the petition. Therefore, the petition

stands dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

nv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top