HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B M SHYAM PRASAD
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
THE DY. LABOUR COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WP/19351/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.19351/2016 (L/KSRTC)
BETWEEN :
Karnataka State Road
Transport Corporation,
Bangalore Central Division,
Shanthi Nagar, K H Road,
Bangalore – 560 027
by its Divisional Controller,
represented by its Chief Law Officer.
... Petitioner
(By Smt. Renuka H. R., Advocate)
AND :
1.
The Dy. Labour Commissioner & Appellate
Authority under the Payment of
Gratuity Act, Region 2,
Karmika Bhavan, Bannerghatta Road,
Bengaluru – 560 029.
2.
The Asst.Labour Commissioner &
Controlling Authority under the Payment of
Gratuity Act, Division IV,
Karmika Bhavan, Bannerghatta Road,
Bengaluru – 560 029.
3.
N. Mani,
S/o Narayanaswamy,
2
Adult, No.7, 8th G Street,
Jogupalya, Ulsoor,
Bengaluru – 560 008.
... Respondents
(By Smt. H.C.Kavitha, High Court Government Pleader for
R1 and R2; Sri Chowdappa D N ., Adv., for R3)
This writ petition is filed under article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated
14.9.2015 bearing No. DLC B-2/DLC/CR/275/2014-15
passed by the first respondent (Annexure-C).
This writ petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing
in ‘B’ Group this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
The Counsel for the parties file a Joint Memo, and
in continuation of the Joint Memo, they submit that the
appellate authority has recomputed the gratuity amount
payable by the petitioner and concluded that a sum of
Rs.36,345/- is the difference amount that will have to
be paid by the petitioner along with interest at the rate
of 10% per annum for the period from 3.2.2012 till the
date of deposit. However, the payment of Rs.26,970/-
on 16.5.2007 has not been considered. If this amount
is considered, the petitioner would have to pay only a
3
sum of Rs.9,375/- with interest at the rate of 10% from
3.2.2012 till 8.1.2014. As such, the appellate
authority’s order in No.DLC B-2/DLC/CR/275/2014-15
dated 14.09.2015 may be modified.
In the light of the joint submissions in line with
the Joint Memo, the impugned order by the appellate
authority dated 14.9.2015 is modified holding that the
third respondent would be entitled for a sum of
Rs.9,375/- with interest at the rate of 10% from
3.2.2012 to 8.1.2014.
SD/-
JUDGE
nv