1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.349 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SHREYOSHREE RURAL TECHNOLOGY
AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
T V VENKATESH MURTHY,
S/O LATE T VENKATAPPA,
KALLUR GUBBI TALUK,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
TUMKUR DISTRICT,
KARNATAKA.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI SRINIVASA K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
M S BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE,
KARNATAKA STATE DEPARTMENT OF
HORTICULTURE, LALBAGH,
BANGALORE - 560004. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.SHARADAMBA, AGA)
---
THIS C.M.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO A)
REFER THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE
RESPONDENT TO THE ARBITRATION CENTRE AT BENGALURU
AND APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR, THE AGREEMENT VIDE
ANNEXURE-A, DATED 03/06/2013.
2
THIS C.M.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
The present petition under Section 11 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed by the
petitioner-Shreyoshree
Rural
Technology
and
Rural
Development
Society
against
the
respondents-State
Horticulture Department seeking appointment of an
Arbitrator in pursuance of the Arbitration Clause -14 of the
Agreement dated 03.06.2013 vide Annexure-A.
2. Clause-14 of the said Agreement, which contains
an Arbitration clause, reads as under:-
“ 14.
Procedures for disputes resolutions.
14.1
If a dispute or difference between the
parties arises in connection with the Agreement, the
senior representatives of the parties shall meet as
soon as practicable and endeavor to resolve the said
dispute or difference.
14.2
Any
dispute
arising
out
of
the
Agreement or relating to the Agreement, including
the breach or invalidating of any of the provisions
three of or of the performance of the service, which
cannot be amicably settled between the parties as
mentioned
above,
shall
be
finally
settled
in
accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996, as amended from time to
3
time. The language of arbitration shall be English and
place of the arbitration shall be in Bangalore. The
award shall be final binding upon the Parties.”
3.
The material on record discloses that since
disputes arose between the parties in relation to the
aforesaid Agreement dated 03.06.2013 containing the
aforesaid arbitration agreement at Clause No.14.2, on
03.03.2021, the petitioner invoked the aforesaid arbitration
clause and issued a notice to the respondents putting forth
various claims and contentions and nominating and
appointing a sole arbitrator and calling upon the
respondents to give their concurrence / consent to refer the
dispute to arbitration. However, despite having received
the said notice, the respondents have neither sent any
reply nor complied with the requests and demands made in
the aforesaid arbitration notice.
4.
Subsequently, the parties have not only failed
to resolve their disputes but they have also not reached any
consensus / agreement for appointment of an arbitrator and
as such, petitioner is before this Court by way of the
present petition.
4
5.
In
view
of
the
aforesaid
facts
and
circumstances, though several contentions have been
urged by both sides in support of their respective claims,
without expressing any opinion on the merits / demerits of
the rival contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to allow
this petition by referring the dispute between the parties to
arbitration with the consent of both sides by appointing
Hon’ble Justice K.Sreedhar Rao, Former Judge, High
Court of Karnataka, to act as the sole Arbitrator to resolve
the dispute between the parties under the provisions of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as per the Rules
governing the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre (Domestic
& International) at Bengaluru.
6. However, in view of Clause – 14.1 of the
Agreement referred to supra, both parties have agreed that
they would attempt to resolve the dispute amicably by
mediation / conciliation between Senior representatives
from both sides. Under these circumstances, I also deem it
just and appropriate to direct the parties to attempt to
resolve the dispute amicably by mediation / conciliation and
5
only if the same fails, the dispute would automatically get
referred to arbitration without further orders and without
reference to the Bench.
7. In the result, I pass the following:-
ORDER
(i) Petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) In the first instance, the representatives of the
petitioner are hereby directed to appear before the 2nd
respondent on 17.08.2022 at 3.00 PM. Pursuant thereto,
the 2nd respondent shall attempt to resolve the dispute with
the petitioner amicably by recourse to mediation /
conciliation.
(iii) In the event, the dispute does not get resolved
amicably as stated supra, the dispute shall stand
automatically referred to arbitration as stated below without
further ord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.