SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
SRI SUNDHARA MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
SMT TAMILSELVI – Respondent
RPFC/64/2017



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

RPFC No. 64 OF 2017

BETWEEN:

SRI SUNDHARA MURTHY

SON OF LATE VENKATASWAMY

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

R/AT NO 1103, OPP SERVICE STATION

PARANDHAHALLI ROAD,

SWARNANAGAR ROBERTSONPET K G F

KOLAR DISTRICT – 563122.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. D. R. RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT. TAMILSELVI

W/O SUNDARAMURTHY

D/O LAKSMINARAYANA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

2.

KUM PRIYA. S

D/O SUNDARAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS

MINOR REPRESENTED HER

MOTHER SMT TAMILSELVI.

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 6TH CROSS,

3RD BLOCK, GANDHINAGAR, ROBERTSONPET K G F

KOLAR DISTRICT - 563122

...RESPONDENTS

2

THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF

FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED

16.03.2012 PASSED IN C.M.C NO. 45/2010 ON THE FILE

OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KGF,

PARTLY ALLOWING THE PEITITON FILED AGAINST THE

ORDER DATED 21.03.2016 PASSED IN CR.M.C. NO.

523/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND

PRL. JMFC., KGF ALLOWING THE PETITON FILED UNDER

SEC. 127 OF CR.PC FOR MAINTENANCE.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

None appears for the petitioner. Perused the

records.

2. This petition is filed under Section 19(4) of

Family Courts Act challenging the order passed in

C.M.C.No.523/2014 filed under Section 127 of

Cr.P.C. In view of the bar contained under Section

19(4) of the Family Courts Act, the petition is

dismissed as not maintainable.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top