HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH
SRI. A. PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/7510/2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION No.7510/2020
BETWEEN:
SRI. A. PRAKASH
S/O LATE ANJINAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.369,
”LAKSHMI VENKATESWARA NILAYA”
3RD CROSS, RAMAKKA LAYOUT
NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE
HOSAKOTE TOWN-562 114
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI A.G.NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 .
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY HOSAKOTE POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-01
2 .
SRI N.G. NAGA BHUSHAN
S/O LATE GOPALA KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
RESIDING AT
”LAKSHMI VENKATESWARA NILAYA”
1ST MAIN, KAVERI NAGARA
NEAR OM SHREE SCHOOL
2
SIR M.V. EXTENSION
HOSAKOTE TOWN-562 114
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., HCGP FOR R1;
VIDE ORDER DATED 21.01.2021, NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD
SUFFICIENT)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C. PRAYING THIS COURT TO QUASH THE CHARGE
SHEET FILED AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CR.NO.292/2018
DATED 05.06.2018 AND REGISTERED IN C.C.NO.1511/2018 ON
THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
HOSAKOTE FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 408, 409,
420, 471, 506, R/W 34 OF IPC AND RELEASE HE PETITIONER
FROM THE CASE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying
this Court to quash the charge sheet in Crime No.292/218 for
the offences punishable under Sections 408, 409, 420, 471, 506
read with Section 34 of IPC.
2.
The factual matrix of the case is that, respondent
No.2 herein has filed a complaint before the police that he is one
of the Director of Shri Chowdeshwari Handloom and powerlooms
3
Manufacturing and Marketing Sahakara Sangha, Hosakote, and
other members are also there in the Society. This petitioner
created Bank account in the BDCC Bank in the name of several
beneficiaries and created particularly fake delivery challans and
obtained the signatures of the beneficiaries and made the other
persons to stand and took photographs and got released the
amount under the Scheme to the tune of Rs.40,50,000/- and the
same was misused. Based on the complaint, the police have
registered a case against the petitioner and investigated the
matter and filed the charge sheet for the offences punishable
under Sections 408, 409, 420, 471, 506 read with Section 34 of
IPC
3.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that the beneficiaries have not given the complaint
and respondent No.2 was not having any locus standi to file the
complaint and also there is a delay in lodging the complaint.
Respondent No.2 having the enmity against this petitioner, he
indulged in lodging a complaint. Hence, it is a fit case to exercise
4
the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to quash the
proceedings.
4.
Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader
appearing for respondent No.1/State would submit that the
petitioner is the Secretary of the particular Sangha and he
indulged in misusing the funds which he had availed from the
Government and the amount was not given to the beneficiaries.
The statement of beneficiaries-CWs.2 to 16 was also recorded
and they made the statement before the Investigating Officer
that they have not received any benefit to the tune of
Rs.13,50,000/-, which was misused by the petitioner and there
is a material against this petitioner. Hence, it requires a trial.
5.
In reply to the arguments of learned High Court
Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1/State, the
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents
are not considered.
6.
Having heard the arguments of the respective
counsel and having perused the grounds urged in the petition,
5