SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MRS. NASERA GHOUSE RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. TOYEBA BEGUM – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The Counsel for the parties submit that the first respondent, who is the mother of the appellant and other respondents, is dead and she is survived only by the appellant and the other respondents and the right to sue survives only in their favour. The counsel also submit that they may be permitted to make necessary endorsement in the cause title.

The counsel are permitted to make a note in the cause title indicating the demise of the first respondent and that the appellant and other respondents are her only legal heirs, and the necessary note in the cause title is also made. The filing of the amended Memorandum of Appeal is dispensed with.

The appellant and the other respondents are present and are identified by their respective counsel, and they have filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which reads as follows:

“MEMORANDUM OF COMPROMISE PETITION UNDER ORDER 23 RULE 3 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 The plaintiff/appellant and defendants/respondents above named jointly submit their compromise petition here as under:-

1. The subject matter of the suit is for partition and for separate possession of the suit schedule property

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top