- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:27242
CRL.RP No. 602 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 602 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
M S RAVI
S/O SUNDREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/O MATTAVARA VILLAGE,
MUGTHIHALLI POST,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK
AND DISTRICT - 577 101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. H P LAKSHMI,
W/O MANJUNATHAGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
HOUSEWIFE AND COFFEE PLANTER,
LAKSHMI NILAYA,
BEHIND VYASHYA HOSTEL,
CHIKKAMAGALURU CITY - 577 101.
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT - SERVED)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH
SECTION 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED
28.08.2020 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.266/2019 BY
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.11.2019 PASSED BY THE I
ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., CHIKKAMAGALURU IN
C.C.NO.730/2014 AND THE PETITIONER TO BE ACQUITTED FOR THE
OFFENCE ALLEGED AGAINST HIM.
THIS CRL.RP, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Digitally signed
by PAVITHRA
N
Location: High
Court Of
Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:27242
CRL.RP No. 602 of 2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the memo
dated 03.08.2023. He has produced the following documents
along with the memo;
I. Certified
copy
of
the
order
sheet
in
Crl.Misc.No.488/2019 before the learned Civil
Judge and JMFC, Chikmagalur ('the trial Court'
for short).
II. Certified copy of the petition filed under
Section 421 and 423 of Cr.PC, and
III. Certified copy of the joint memo filed under
Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
('the NI Act' for short) filed in the said
Crl.Misc.No.488/2019.
2.
The joint memo filed by the petitioner and the
respondent before the trial Court reads as under;
"01) On
the
basis
of
the
cheque,
the
Petitioner/compainant had filed a complaint against
the respondent in C.C.No.730/2014 and this Hon'ble
Court
passed
a
Conviction
judgment
dated:
11/11/2019. Thereafter the Respondent/Accused
had filed Criminal appeal No.266/2019 on the file of
the Sessions Court at Chikmagalur as per Direction
of the Sessions Court, the Respondent/Accused has
deposited a sum of Rs.19,600 before this Hon'ble
Court in CC No.730/2014 in Receipt No.433/49
- 3 -
dated: 04/02/2020 and the said Criminal Appeal
No.266/2019 dismissed on 28/08/2019. Agreeved
by the both Judgments the respondent/accused has
filed a Criminal Revision Petition No.602/2020 on
the file of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka and
the said Criminal Petition still is pending.
02)
In the mean while the petitioner and the
respondent have setelled the matter for Rs.60,000/-
and the petitioner/complainant has received the said
amount of Rs.60,000 from the accused/Respondent
it is full and final settlement of the case. The
deposit amount of Rs.19,600 may be retuned to the
accused/Respondent. As per settlement accused is
entatile for aquital but the said Criminal case is
pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka.
Therefore the same facts may be intimated to
Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka accordingly they
are intended to send a Joint Memo for Compromise
before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka.
Wherefore it is prayed that this Hon'ble court
be pleased to close the case as compromised in the
above case in the ends of justice."
3.
The order sheet dated 24.02.2021 of the trial Court
reads as under;
"Case called out. Petitioner and respondent
and L/C for petitioner and respondent present. And
filed joint memo U/Sec. 147 of N.I. Act. It is
submitted by both the parties and counsels that they
have
arrived
at
settlement
between
them,
Accordingly they have compromised the matter. In
the regard, they have also preferred the application
U/Sec. 147 of N.I. Act. Verified the same. The
parties enquired. They submits that it is in
accordance with the terms and conditions. That
have arrived at settlement and the same has been
reduced into writing.
- 4 -
The
contents
of
application/joint
memo
U/Sec.147 of N.I. Act. is read over to parties. They
submits the same is correct. The compromise which
arrived between the parties is with respect to subject
matter of the case and not against the provision of
Indian
contract
Act
or
against
public
policy.
Therefore, under the circumstances the parties are
permitted to enter into compromise.
Today petitioner received a sum of Rs.60,000/-
from accused as final settlement amount. Case is
refereed to Lok adalth held on 27.03.2021 for
acceptance."
4.
Therefore, it is clear that the matter was amicably
settled between the parties before the trial Court in terms of
the joint memo produced before this Court and the complainant
had received Rs.60,000/- from the accused towards full and
final settlement of his claim, on 24.02.2021. But in the
meantime,
the
accused
was
convicted
for
the
offence
punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act by the trial Court
vide its judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
11.11.2019, which was confirmed in Crl.A.No.266/2019 by the
First Appellate Court. Therefore, the criminal revision petition
was filed before this Court.
5.
The Respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.