SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT SHANTHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

WRIT PETITION NO.14702 OF 2021(GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

SMT. SHANTHAMMA,

W/O LATE K V NAGARAJU,

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

R/O DASARABEEDHI,

KALYAGATE, WARD NO.17,

MAGADI TOWN, MAGADI,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 120.

(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAMESH K R, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

BENGALURU – 560 001.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,

RAMANAGARA – 562 159.

3. THE TAHASILDAR,

MAGADI TALUK,

MAGADI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 120.

4. THE CHIEF OFFICER,

TOWN MUNICPAL CORPORATION,

MAGADI TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT -562 120.

… RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B V KRISHNA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

NOTICE TO R4 IS D/W V.C.O DATED 03.09.2021)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

2

DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOT AN ALTERNATIVE

SITE TO THE PETITIONER IN MAGADI TOWN ON ACCOUNT

OF USAGE OF THE LAND WHERE SITE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top