SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
RAKESH SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


order

12. Point No. (iii) : Whether once there is seizure made of certain material objects like servers, computers, etc., same can be returned to the person from whom the said items are seized prior to the investigation being complete?

12.1. It is claimed that certain items were seized during search of the premises. In the present matter as can be seen from the panchanama drawn up, the following have been seized:

1. Dell Latitude/E6430, SlNo.52W7QV1

2. Dell latitude/E6430, sl.No.JVX7QV1

3. DVR-1-HIKVISION SlNo.837825230, Model DS-7B16HUHI-K2

4. DVR-2-HIKVISION SlNo.130177496, Model, DS-7B16HUHI-K2

5. DVR-3-HIKVISION SlNo.130177715, Model, DS-7B16HUHI-K2

6. DVR-3-HIKVISION SlNo. 837825212, Model, DS-7B16HUHI-K2 Admitted Exhibit Details: Social Edit (5) Company: HP; Model;HP 280G3MT Service TAG: INA 738YHXS S/N: 00518152219999 (36B0197) Social Media 1 (6) Company: Cooler Master;Model;Assembled S/N: RC250CKKN31125200014 Main Storage Server (For All & Ingest) (1) Company: Cooler Master (5 HDD SATA & 1 DDF)

S/N;RC311BRKN51174200067 (user Name: Amdinistrator; Password: welcome@1) FTO Storage Server (2) Model: HP Enterprise (Proliant DL180 Gen9)

S/N:SGH711TE3J (user Name:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top