SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K. NATARAJAN, J
JAYANNA S/O BADAGI SURAIAH – Appellant
Versus
THE DY COMMR CHITRADURGA DIST – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN

WRIT PETITION No.28263/2004 (SC/ST)

BETWEEN

SRI JAYANNA

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

S/O. BADAGI SURAIAH,

RESIDING AT CHITRAYYANAHATTI,

CHELLAKERE TOWN,

CHELLAKERE TALUK,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SMT. MANJULA D., ADV., FOR

SRI L. SRINIVASA BABU, ADV.)

AND

1.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT,

CHITRADURGA.

2.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

CHITRADURGA SUB-DIVISION,

CHITRADURGA.

3.

SMT. KHATEJABI

W/O. BUDEN SAB,

SINCE DECEASED BY LR:

SRI SYED ILYAS,

S/O. SYED BUDEN SAB,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

2

RESIDING AT CHELLAKERE TOWN,

CHELLAKERE TALUK,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, HCGP FOR R1 & R2;

SRI KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADV., FOR R3.)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO

QUASH VIDE ANNEXURE-E DATED 30.06.2004 BY R1 AND ALSO

VIDE ANNEXURE-B DATED 29.09.1995 BY R2 AND DIRECTION

TO THE R2 TO RESTORE THE LAND IN QUESTION IN FAVOUR

OF THE PETITIONER.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top