HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
T G SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA,K.SOMASHEKAR
SMT VANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY BATLAHALLI POLICE STATION – Respondent
CRL.A/903/2016
- -
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T G SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 903 OF 2016
C/W
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2016
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 903 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SMT VANI
W/O RAVICHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
OCCUPATION:COOLIE WORK,
RESIDING AT MAVUKERE VILLAGE,
CHINTAMANI TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563125.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G M SRINIVASAREDDY.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY BATLAHALLI POLICE STATION
BATLAHALLI, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROESCUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE., ADDL. SPP)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET
ASIDE
THE
JUDGMENT
AND
ORDER
DATED
- -
2
15.12.2014 AND SENTENCE DATED 19.12.2014 PASSED
BY THE ADHOC DIST. AND S.J., F.T.C.-II, CHINTAMANI IN
S.C.NO.21/2013
-
CONVICTING
THE
APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
302 AND 201 OF IPC.
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SRI. B. BYRAREDDY
S/O VEENKATARAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
OCCUPATION:AGRICULTURE AND
BORE MOTORS REWINDING WORK
R/AT SOMAKALAHALLI VILLAGE,
CHINTAMANI TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G M SRINIVASAREDDY.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY BATLAHALLI POLICE STATION
BATLAHALLI, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC
PROSECUTORE,
BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL SPP)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION
DATED 15.12.2014 AND 19.12.2014 PASSED BY THE
ADHOC DIST. AND S.J., F.T.C.-III, CHINTAMANI IN
S.C.NO.21/2013
-
CONVICTING
THE
APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
302 AND 201 OF IPC.
- -
3
THESE
CRIMINAL
APPEALS
COMING
ON
FOR
HEARING THIS DAY, K. SOMASHEKAR .J., DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
These appeals are directed against the judgment of
conviction and order of sentence rendered by the trial Court
in S.C.No.21/2013 dated 15.12.2014, for the offences
punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, 'IPC').
2.
Heard Sri.G.M.Srinivasareddy, learned counsel
for the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 and the learned
Additional State Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the
judgment of conviction rendered by the Trial Court in
S.C.No.21/2013 dated 15.12.2014.
3.
The factual matrix of the appeals are as under:-
It transpires from the case of the prosecution that on
26.09.2012 at about 10.30 p.m., the accused persons with
a common intention to do away with the life of the deceased
- Ravichandra, who was suffering from paralysis stroke and
was unable to walk and speak properly took him in a Hero
Honda motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-03/Y-5221
- -
4
which belongs to the appellant No.2 namely., Sri Byrareddy
to Siddappankere of Somakalahalli and there the accused
persons murdered Ravichandra by choking and after
committing the murder, and in order to destroy the evidence
they put the dead body into the tank after tying rope to the
neck of the deceased and another end of the rope with stone.
Thereby, the accused persons committed the offence
punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of
IPC.
4.
In pursuance of the act of the accused and also
on a complaint being filed by PW.3, who is none other than
the father of the deceased, criminal law was set into motion
by recording FIR for the offences reflected in the substance
of the FIR. Subsequent to registration of the case, the
Investigating Officer had taken up the case for investigation
and thoroughly investigated the case and laid a charge-sheet
against the accused persons by Bettlahalli Police Station.
After completion of the investigation, the Investigating
Officer laid the charge sheet before the committal Court.
- -
5
5.
Su