1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

WRIT APPEAL NO.3708/2019 (BDA)

BETWEEN:

M/S.GODREJ WOODSMAN ESTATE

APARTMENT OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION

BY ITS SECRETARY

GODREJ WOODSMAN ESTATE APARTMENT

BALLARY ROAD, HEBBAL

BENGALURU-560 024

NOW REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT

SHRI.SUDIPTA DATTA

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI.ASHOK R.KALYANASHETTY, ADV.,)

AND:

1.

SMT.VANITHA G.SINGH

HINDHU, W/O SHRI SOUKARNU

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

OCC: NOT MENTIONED IN WP

FLAT NO.603, CEDAR A BLOCK

GODREJ WOODSMAN ESTATE

BALLARI ROAD, HEBBAL

BENGALURU-560 024

2

2.

THE COMMISSIONER

THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY

KUMAR PARK WEST

CHOUDAIAH ROAD

BENGALURU-560 020

3.

THE COMMISSIONER

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGAR PALIKE

HUDSON CIRCLE, BBMP

BENGALURU-560 002

4.

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

BBMP, BYATARAYANAPURA

KODIGEHALLI SUB DVS.

SAHAKARANAGAR, ‘D’ BLOCK

BENGALURU-560 092

… RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.JANARDHANA G., ADV. FOR R-1

SRI.K.KRISHNA, ADV. FOR R-2

SRI.AMIT DESHPANDE, ADV. FOR R-3

R-4 SERVED)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF

THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.08.2019 PASSED ON

IA II/2018 IN WP 57976/2016 AND DISMISS THE IA.

THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J.,

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

3

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for respondent No.2-BDA has drawn

our attention towards the order dated 15.12.2020 passed

in W.P.No.57976/2016 (BDA) and submits that the main

writ petition itself is disposed of, hence the present writ

appeal has become infructuous.

2.

In the light of the order passed on 15.12.2020,

the present writ appeal stands disposed of as infructuous

as the main writ petition itself has been disposed of by the

learned Single Judge. We have not expressed any opinion

on merits. All issues are left open.

In view of disposal of the appeal, I.A.No.3/2019

filed for stay does not survive for consideration.

No order as to costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

TL