HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI NARASAIAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.RP/716/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.716/2012
BETWEEN:
SRI. NARASAIAH,
S/O SRINIVAS,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/O BASAVAIAHNA KERI,
GANGA STREET, MALAVALLI TOWN,
MANDYA DISTRICT
..PETITIONER
(BY SMT. NALINA K. FOR
SRI S.K. VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY MALAVALLI TOWN POLICE,
MALAVALLI, MANDYA DISTRICT
..RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.K.P YASHODHA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED
UNDER SECTION 397 R/W SECTION 401 CR.P.C. TO SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER OF
SENTENCE
DATED
07.03.2007
PASSED
IN
C.C.NO.
56/2006 BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND JMFC,
MALAVALLI
AND
JUDGMENT
AND
ORDER
DATED
08.06.2012 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, F.T.C-1,
2
MANDYA IN CRL.A.NO.14/2007, BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE
ACCUSED/PETITIONER
OF
THE
CHARGES
LEVELED
AGAINST HIM IN C.C.NO.56/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE
CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND JMFC, MALAVALLI, MANDYA
DISTRICT.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON
FOR HEARING THIS DAY THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under
Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C praying to
set aside the Judgment of conviction and order of
sentence passed in C.C.No.56/2006 dated 07.03.2007
by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and JMFC, Malavalli and the
Judgment and order dated 08.06.2012 passed in
Crl.A.No.14/2007 by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track
Court-I, Mandya and to acquit the revision petitioner
for the charges levelled against him.
3
2.
The appeal came to be partly allowed and the
conviction against accused No.2 was confirmed for the
offence punishable under Sections 341 and 326 read
with 34 of IPC and was sentenced to pay a fine of
Rs.500/- for the offence punishable under Section 341
r/w Section 34 of IPC, in default to undergo simple
imprisonment for one month and to undergo simple
imprisonment for a period of six months and pay a
fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default to pay fine to
undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the
offence punishable under Section 326 read with 34
IPC.
3.
The appeal against Accused No.1 is stated to
have got abated by virtue of death of the said
accused.
4.
In order to avoid the repetition, the substance
of the complaint is extracted from the certified copy of
4
the judgment in Crl.A.No.14/2007 which reads as
under:
"C.W.1 Srinivasa is the owner of
mutton shop situated near Ganga talkies
Malavalli town. That on 6.9.2001 at 9
a.m., accused No.1 and 2 came near the
said mutton shop of CW1 with an
intention to pick up galata with him.
During the course of galata Accused No.1
asked CW1 why he is attracting his
customers to your shop and why you have
sent mutton to his shop through CW2 to
cut it, though he (C.W.1) has sold the
said mutton to CW2. Thereafter Accused
No.2 caught hold CW1 preventing him to
go ahead. Accused No.1 assaulted on the
left side head of CW1 with an iron rod
forcibly and caused him grievous injury.
So, it is alleged by the prosecution that A-
1 and 2 have committed the offences
punishable under Section 341 and 326
r/w Section 34 of the IPC."
5.
Accused Nos.1 and 2 appeared before the trial
court. Charge has been framed against accused Nos.1
and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 341
and 326 read with 34 of IPC. Accused Nos.1 and 2
5
pleaded not guilty of the offences and claimed to be
tried.
6.
In order to avoid overlapping and repetition, the
parties are addressed in accordance with their status
and ranking as stood before the Trial court.
7.
The present Revision Petition is filed by accused
No.2-Narasaiah.
Accused
No.1-Thammanna
also
convicted and sentenced