SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT. NARASAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. R M VENKATARAMAIAH – Respondent


This appeal by the plaintiffs is directed against the

order dated August 6, 2018 in O.S. No.181/2016 on the file of

Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Doddaballapur rejecting the

plaint in the suit for declaration.

2.

For the sake of convenience, parties shall be referred

as per their status before the Trial Court.

4

3.

Heard Shri Ashok Haranahalli, learned Advocate for

the appellants/plaintiffs and Shri. Madhusudhan Rao, learned

Advocate for the respondents/defendants.

4.

Plaintiffs have filed the instant suit seeking

declaration that:

 plaintiffs and defendants No.2 to 5 are the title-

holders of schedule ‘A’ of suit property;

 schedule ‘B’ property belongs to the Government;

and

 the Gift Deed dated 25.01.1973 as not binding on

plaintiffs.

5.

Brief facts of the case are, first plaintiff’s husband

Hanumaiah had purchased schedule A property. One

Ashwanthnarayana had purchased schedule B property. Both

Hanumaiah and Ashwanthnarayana gifted their respective

properties in favour of Venkatamramaiah (defendant No.1)

to utilise the income derived from the properties for

Shri. Anjaneya Swamy and Shri. Ramalingeshwara Swamy

Temples.

5

6.

Venkat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top