PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT. NARASAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. R M VENKATARAMAIAH – Respondent
This appeal by the plaintiffs is directed against the
order dated August 6, 2018 in O.S. No.181/2016 on the file of
Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Doddaballapur rejecting the
plaint in the suit for declaration.
2.
For the sake of convenience, parties shall be referred
as per their status before the Trial Court.
4
3.
Heard Shri Ashok Haranahalli, learned Advocate for
the appellants/plaintiffs and Shri. Madhusudhan Rao, learned
Advocate for the respondents/defendants.
4.
Plaintiffs have filed the instant suit seeking
declaration that:
plaintiffs and defendants No.2 to 5 are the title-
holders of schedule ‘A’ of suit property;
schedule ‘B’ property belongs to the Government;
and
the Gift Deed dated 25.01.1973 as not binding on
plaintiffs.
5.
Brief facts of the case are, first plaintiff’s husband
Hanumaiah had purchased schedule A property. One
Ashwanthnarayana had purchased schedule B property. Both
Hanumaiah and Ashwanthnarayana gifted their respective
properties in favour of Venkatamramaiah (defendant No.1)
to utilise the income derived from the properties for
Shri. Anjaneya Swamy and Shri. Ramalingeshwara Swamy
Temples.
5
6.
Venkat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.