HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
INDIA AWAKE FOR TRANSPARENCY – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR – Respondent
WP/12073/2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.12073 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
INDIA AWAKE FOR TRANSPARENCY
REP. BY P. SADANAND
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
SHRISTHI CRESCENDO
24, DESIKA ROAD
MYLAPORE, CHENNAI-600 004 ... PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. R. SUBRAMANIAN, ADVOCATE)
AND :
1.
THE DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
6TH FLOOR, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN
KHAN MARKET
NEW DELHI-110 003
2.
MR. AZIM H. PREMJI
SURVEY NO.574
DODDAKANNELI VILLAGE
SARJAPUR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 035
3.
MRS. YASEEM AZIM PREMJI
SURVEY NO.574
DODDAKANNELI VILLAGE
SARJAPUR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 035
4.
MR. PAGALTHIVARTHI SRINIVASAN
NO.524, 16TH CROSS
INDIRANAGAR
II STAGE
BENGALURU-560 038
2
5.
M/S HASHAM INVESTMENT AND
TRADING COMPANY PVT. LTD
REP. BY MR AZIM H. PREMJI
DIRECTOR
NO.134, NEXT TO WIPRO
CORPORATE OFFICE
DODDAKANNELLI
SARJAPUR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 035 ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI. P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SHRI. C.V. GANESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SHRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SHRI. S. GANESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SHRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO FORTHWITH
REGISTER A CASE FOR OFFENCES IN RESPECT OF THE OFFENCE OF MONEY
LAUNDERING ARISING OUT OF THE SCHEDULE OFFENCES SET OUT IN
SPECIAL CASE 69/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE LD XXIII ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE BENGALURU AND SPECIAL COURT FOR PC ACT
OFFENCES BENGALURU BASED ON THE INFORMATION DATED 31.01.2020
FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ANNEXURE-E ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
ORDERS ON 13.01.2021, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Heard Shri R. Subramanian, learned advocate for the
petitioner, Shri. C.V.Nagesh, learned Senior Advocate for
respondent No.4 and Shri S. Ganesh, learned Senior Advocate
for respondent No.5.
2.
Learned Senior Advocates for respondents raised a
preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of this writ
3
petition. Among various grounds, they submitted that
petitioner has filed a public interest litigation registered as
W.P.No.3635/2020 with a prayer inter alia for a writ of
mandamus and to direct respondents No.1 to 10 therein to
constitute a multi disciplinary investigation team to investigate
and prosecute Shri.A.H.Premji (respondent No.11 therein) and
his associates for the offences alleged to have been committed
by them, set out in its representations dated January 30, 2020
and February 3, 2020 submitted to respondents No.1 to 6
therein.
They
submitted
that
Director,
Enforcement
Directorate, respondent No.1 herein was respondent No.7 in
the PIL.
3.
In this writ petition, petitioner has inter alia prayed
for a direction against Director of Enforcement to register a
case of money laundering arising out of scheduled offences set
out in Special Case No.69/2020 on the file of learned XXIII
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru based on
the information given by petitioner in its representation dated
January 31, 2020.
4
4.
Shri. Nagesh, learned Senior Advocate made
following submissions:
Petitioner
has
unconditionally
withdrawn
the
PIL.
Therefore, this petition is not maintainable on the
ground of public policy as held in Sarguja Transport
Service Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal1;
Petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy to
approach the Special Judge and it has already filed PCR
No.38/2020 before the XXI Additional City Civil and
Sessions Judge, Bengaluru under Section 190(1)(c) and
Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and