Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
SRI G K RAMAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR – Respondent
RFA/699/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
R.F.A.No.699/2008
C/W
R.F.A.Nos.700/2008, 701/2008, 811/2008, 812/2008 AND
813/2008
IN RFA No.699/2008
BETWEEN:
1 . SRI G K RAMAMURTHY
S/O LATE.SRI.G.R.KRISHNAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS.
2 . SMT. G R SHANTHA RAM
W/O.SRI.G.K.RAMAMURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
BOTH ARE AT No.83,
SURVEYOR'S STREET,
BANGALORE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S S NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.M.D.RAGHUNATH,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE SRI GANAPATHI HARI BHAT.
SINCE DEAD BY LRs.
1 . SMT.MEENAKSHI BHAT
2
W/O LATE SRI GANAPATHI HARI BHAT
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS.
2. SMT.SHUBHA V BHAT
W/O LATE SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
3 . SRI TRIVIKRAM V BHAT
S/O LATE SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
ALL R/AT No.24,
SHANKAR MUTT ROAD
SHANKARAPURAM,
BANGALORE – 560 004.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE
FOR R1(a to c)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 2.1.2008
PASSED IN O.S.No.15102/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI
ADDITIONAL
CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
MAYOHALL, BANGALORE(CCH-20) PARTLY DECREEING
THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT.
IN RFA No.700/2008
BETWEEN:
SRI D R MOHAN BABU
S/O LATE SRI D.M.RANGAIAH SETTY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
BY HIS GPA HOLDER
SRI D.R.JAYAKUMAR GUPTA
# 786, 'SREENIDHI' 15TH CROSS
100 FT RING ROAD,
J.P.NAGAR, 1ST PHASE,
3
BANGALORE.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI S S NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE
SRI.M.D.RAGHUNATH,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE SRI GANAPATHI HARI BHAT.
SINCE DEAD BY LRs.
1a . SMT.MEENAKSHI BHAT
W/O LATE SRI GANAPATHI HARI BHAT
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS.
1b . SMT.SHUBHA V BHAT
W/O LATE SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
1c . SRI TRIVIKRAM V BHAT
S/O LATE SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
ALL R/AT No.24,
SHANKAR MUTT ROAD
SHANKARAPURAM,
BANGALORE – 560 004.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE
FOR R1(a to c)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 2.1.2008
PASSED IN O.S.No.15103/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI
ADDITIONAL
CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
MAYOHALL, BANGALORE(CCH-20) PARTLY DECREEING
THE SUIT BY ENTITLING THE PETITIONER HEREIN FOR
RENTALS AT THE RATE OF Rs.5,000/- P.M AND REJECTING
THE PRAYER FOR EJECTMENT.
4
IN RFA No.701/2008
BETWEEN:
1 . SRI G K PRAKASH
/O LATE SRI. G.R. KRISHNAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
2 . SMT. SANDHYA G PRAKASH
W/O SRI G K PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
BOTH AT #759/13, 13TH CROSS
7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR WEST
BANGALORE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S S NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE
SRI.M.D.RAGHUNATH,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE SRI GANAPATHI HARI BHAT.
SINCE DEAD BY LRs.
1a . SMT.MEENAKSHI BHAT
W/O LATE SRI GANAPATHI HARI BHAT
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS.
1b . SMT.SHUBHA V BHAT
W/O LATE SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
1c . SRI TRIVIKRAM V BHAT
S/O LATE SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
ALL R/AT No.24,
SHANKAR MUTT ROAD
5
SHANKARAPURAM,
BANGALORE – 560 004.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE
FOR R1(a to c)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 2.1.2008
PASSED IN O.S.No.15104/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI
ADDITIONAL
CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
MAYOHALL, BANGALORE(CCH-20) PARTLY DECREEING
THE SUIT BY ENTITLING THE APPELLANT HEREIN FOR THE
RENTALS AT THE RATE OF Rs.5,000/- P.M AND REJECTING
THE PRAYER FOR EJECTMENT.
IN RFA No.811/2008
BETWEEN:
1. SRI G B VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE SRI.GANAPATHI HARI BHAT
AGED ABOUT 57 YERAS,
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRs.
1a . SMT.SUBHA V BHAT
W/O LATE SRI G B VIJAYAKUMA
