1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRL.P NO.7046 OF 2022
BETWEEN
SRI. SANTHOSH KUMAR B.K
S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
NO.6, SATHYA ARCADE
V BLOCK
VISHWESHWARAIAH LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 560 086
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C.P.DHANANJAYA, ADVOCATE)
AND
STATE BY BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION
REP BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.R.D.RENUKARADHYA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 438 CR.P.C BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO DIRECT
THE BYADARAHALLI POLICE TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL
IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME NO.323/2022,
FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 427,
406, 420, 447, 448, 465, 468, 471 R/W 34 OF INDIAN
PENAL CODE, THE SAME IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF
LEARNED CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (CJM COURT),
2
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS CRL.P COMING FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused
No.4 under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for granting
anticipatory bail in Crime No.323/2022 registered
by Byadarahalli Police Station, Bengaluru for the
offences punishable under Sections 427, 34, 406,
420, 447, 448, 465, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that on
the complaint of Dr.P.Narayana Bhat, the Police
registered a case. It is alleged by him that he has
purchased a site bearing No.4 culled out of
Sy.No.39 of Andrahalli vilalge, Yeshwanthapura
Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk on 08.02.1993 from
accused No.1 - Ankamma and he has constructed a
compound
and
he
is
paying
the
taxes.
Subsequently, on 02.07.2022, he came to know
3
that his compound was demolished by somebody
and constructed a new compound wall. On enquiry,
he
came
to
know
that
this
petitioner
has
constructed the compound wall. On enquiry with
the Sub-Registrar office, he came to know that
accused Nos.3 and 4 colluded with accused No.2
got executed General Power of Attorney in favour of
Jayamma, who is said to be the mother-in-law of
the accused No.3 and accused No.3-Manjunath sold
the site to this petitioner for valuable consideration
by executing the sale deed on 27.11.2020. After
registering the case, the Police arrested accused
No.3 and he is said to be released on bail. Now the
Police are making hectic efforts to arrest the
petitioner and hence, the petitioner is before this
Court.
3.
Having heard the arguments of learned
counsel for the petitioner and the respondent and
on perusal of the records, admittedly, this petitioner
4
is said to be the purchaser of the property for
valuable consideration of Rs.38,00,000/- (Rupees
Thirty Eight Lakhs) from accused No.3-Manjunatha.
Accused No.3 is said to be arrested and is said to
have handed over the entire documents with this
petitioner. The complainant stated the General
Power of Attorney has been created by accused
No.3 in the name of accused No.2-Jayamma as
good as the General Power of Attorney executed by
Ankamma in favour of accused No.2 and based on
General Power of Attorney, sale deed was executed
by accused No.3 in favour of this petitioner.
4.
The
matter
requires
detailed
investigation as to whether this petitioner is a
bonafide purchaser or in collusion with accused
No.3, he has got this document without paying any
sale consideration has to be verified in the
investigation. The complainant is also said to have
filed an original suit in O.S.No.1625/2022 against
5
this petitioner and others for declaration and
possession of the property in dispute.
5.
Considering the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the
merits of the case, if the petitioner is granted bail
by imposing certain conditions, no prejudice would
be caused to the case of the prosecution. Hence, I
pass the following order:
Order
(A)
The Criminal Petition is allowed.
(B)
The respondent – Police are directed to
release the petitioner-accused No.4 on bail in
the event of his arrest Crime No.323/2022
registered by the Byadarahalli Police Station
for the offences punishable under Sections
427, 34, 406, 420, 447, 448, 465, 468 and
471
of
IPC,
subject
to
the
following
conditions;
(i)
Petitioner shall execute a personal
bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-
(Rupees Two Lakhs only) with two
sureties for the likesum to the
6
satisfaction
of
the
Investigating
Officer;
(ii)
Petitioner shall surrender within 15
days from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order;
(iii)
Petitioner shall not indulge in similar
offences strictly;
(iv)
Petitioner
shall
not
directly
or
indirectly tamper with any of the
prosecution witnesses;
(v)
Petitioner shall be deemed to be in
custody for the purpose of recovery
under Section 27 of the Indian
Evidence Act and also for getting
specimen
signature
for
getting
opinion of the expert.
(vi)
Petitioner shall appear before the
Investigating Officer and mark his
attendance
on
every
Monday
between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m.
for a period of two month