SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI K BYRANNA – Appellant
Versus
SRI T CHALAPATHY – Respondent


The Complaint was lodged by the respondent

under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence of

punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments

Act, 1881, alleging that when the cheque is issued in

favour of the complainant by the accused towards

legally recover oval debt when presented for realization

was returned for want of funds.

2.

The learned Magistrate after recording his

own statement took cognizance of the offence and

issued

summons

to

the

accused.

The

learned

Magistrate, in view of the decisions of the Apex Court

rendered in the case of Dhasharath RoopSingh

Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in

2014(3) KCCR 2313 writtened the complaint to be

presented

before

the

learned

Magistrate

having

territorial

jurisdiction,

since,

the

cheque

was

dis-honoured by the Vijaya Bank, Kanakapura Branch,

3

Kanakapura. Before the complaint was returned to the

complainant for presenting it before the learned

Magistrate having territorial jurisdiction. An ordinance

was issued giving within whose jurisdiction the drawee

is having the account. In view of the ordinance issued

the learned Magistrate taking into account that the

complaint was not returned to the complainant directed

the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top