HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI K BYRANNA – Appellant
Versus
SRI T CHALAPATHY – Respondent
The Complaint was lodged by the respondent
under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence of
punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881, alleging that when the cheque is issued in
favour of the complainant by the accused towards
legally recover oval debt when presented for realization
was returned for want of funds.
2.
The learned Magistrate after recording his
own statement took cognizance of the offence and
issued
summons
to
the
accused.
The
learned
Magistrate, in view of the decisions of the Apex Court
rendered in the case of Dhasharath RoopSingh
Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in
2014(3) KCCR 2313 writtened the complaint to be
presented
before
the
learned
Magistrate
having
territorial
jurisdiction,
since,
the
cheque
was
dis-honoured by the Vijaya Bank, Kanakapura Branch,
3
Kanakapura. Before the complaint was returned to the
complainant for presenting it before the learned
Magistrate having territorial jurisdiction. An ordinance
was issued giving within whose jurisdiction the drawee
is having the account. In view of the ordinance issued
the learned Magistrate taking into account that the
complaint was not returned to the complainant directed
the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.