PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
UMAPATHI S – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Petitioner claiming to be a public spirited citizen, is
knocking at the doors of this court seeking a Writ of Quo
Warranto against the private respondents herein who have
been appointed by the respondent-State Government as
Political Secretaries, Chief Advisor and Media Advisor to
the Hon'ble Chief Minister. The orders of the appointment
of these respondents dated 1.6.2023 and 22.5.2023 are
produced and marked as Annexures-A to D.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
argues that the appointment of the private respondents
with the status of Cabinet Rank is without jurisdiction and
unconstitutional. In support of his contention, he heavily
banks upon Article 164(1A) of the Constitution of India
which prescribes that the total number of Ministers
including the Chief Minister in a State shall not exceed
15% of the total number of Members of the Legislative
Assembly. The counsel submits that this ceiling limit is
breached by the appointments in question. Learned
Additional
Government
Advocate
appearing
for
the
- 4 -
respondent Nos.1 & 2 opposes the same contending that
the provisions of Article 164 are not invokable inasmuch as
none of the private respondents has been appoi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.