1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7754 OF 2022
BETWEEN
1 .
ANAND B
S/O BEEMANNA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT NO.83, 6TH CROSS
DASARAHALLI MAIN ROAD
BHUVANESHWARINAGARA
BENGALURU -560 024
ALSO AT BENGALURU NORTH
BENGALURU -560 024
2 .
LAVANYA S
W/O SADASHIVA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
3 .
SADASHIVA
S/O MALLANNA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
PETITIONER NOS.2 AND 3 ARE
R/AT NO.560, NEAR WATER TANK
4TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD
ATTUR LAYOUT, YELAHANKA
BENGALURU -560 064
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.MURTHY NAYKA B. L., ADV.)
AND
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY YELAHANKA NEW TOWN PS
BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560 009
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI R.D. RENUKARADHYA, HCGP)
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438
OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDURE, PRAYING TO
ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR
ARREST IN CR.NO.221/2022 OF YELAHANKA NEW TOWN P.S.,
BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION
427, 506, 504, 419, 420, 447, 465, 468, 471 READ WITH 34 OF
IPC ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ACMM, BANGALORE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the petitioners-accused
Nos.1, 2 and 4 under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., for
granting anticipatory bail in Crime No.221/2022
registered by Yelahanka New Town Police station,
Bengaluru, for the offences punishable under Sections
427, 506, 504, 419, 420, 447, 465, 468, 471 read
with 34 of IPC.
2.
Heard the arguments of learned counsel for
petitioners and learned HCGP for respondent-State.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on
complaint of one Gajendra Reddy filed complaint on
21.07.2022 where he has stated that he has
3
purchased the site from one Ganesh on 10.03.1999
from one Nagaratna/accused No.4 through GPA holder
Ganesh, the son of accused No.4 and he was in
possession. On 21.6.2022 he came to know that the
accused person came in JCB and demolished the
house and the vehicle and caused loss of Rs.10 lakhs
and created documents claiming the right over the
property. After registering the case the police are
trying to arrest the petitioners. Their bail petition
came to be rejected by the Sessions Judge, hence
they are before this Court.
4. Upon hearing the arguments and perusal of
the records, which reveals of course accused persons
said to be claiming right over the property through
sale deed executed by accused No.2/Lavanya and the
said Lavanya is said to have purchased the property
from accused No.4/Nagaratna who is also stated to be
an erstwhile owner of the property through the
complainant.
The
matter
requires
detailed
4
investigation by the police. The complainant also claim
the property over the sale deed and the matter
requires detailed investigation. However by looking to
the facts and circumstances of the case, though the
offence is non bailable, the same is not punishable
either with death or imprisonment of life. The offence
is triable by the Magistrate. Therefore, if the
petitioners are granted bail, no prejudice would be
caused to the case of the prosecution. Hence, the
following;
ORDER
Accordingly, this petition is allowed.
The respondent – Police are directed to release
the petitioners-accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 on bail in the
event of their arrest in Crime No.221/2022 registered
by Yelahanka New Town Police station, Bengaluru, for
the offences punishable under Sections 427, 506, 504,
5
419, 420, 447, 465, 468, 471 read with 34 of IPC,
subject to the following conditions:
(i)
Petitioners shall execute a personal
bond for sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees
Two Lakhs only), each with two sureties
for the likesum to the satisfaction of
the Investigating Officer;
(ii)
Petitioners shall surrender before the
Investigating Officer within fifteen days
from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this order;
(iii)
Petitioners
shall
not
directly
or
indirectly tamper with any of the
prosecution witnesses;
(iv)
Petitioner shall not indulge in any
similar offences;
(v)
Petitioners shall be deemed custody for
the purpose of any recovery under
Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act,
1872 and also for getting specimen
6
signature for obtaining Hand writing
expert's opinion ;
(vi)
Petitioners shall mark their attendance
before
the
Investigating
Officer
between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. on
every Monday for a period of two
months or till filing of charge-sheet
whichever is earlier.
If any of the above conditions are violated, the
prosecution is at liberty to seek cancellation of this
bail order.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AKV