SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S. M. SOMASHEKHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/6242/2017



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2018

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6242/2017

BETWEEN:

1.

S. M. SOMASHEKHAR

S/O. NAGARAJAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

R/AT KURUCHARA COLONY,

SAPTHGIRI EXTENSION,

SIRA TOWN, SIRA TALUK,

TUMKURU DISTRICT-572 137.

2.

S. GIRISH

S/O. SOMANNA,

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

R/AT KAREKALLAHATTI,

SIRA TOWN, SIRA TALUK,

TUMKURU DISTRICT-572 137.

... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI.M.SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY SIRA P.S.,

TUMKUR DISTRICT,

REPRESENTED BY SPP,

HIGH COURT BUILDING,

BANGALORE-560 001.

... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI S.RACHAIAH, HCGP)

2

THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.185/2017 OF RESPODENT SIRA

P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 379 OF IPC AND SEC.21,

3(1) OF MMRD ACT AND RULE.44(2) OF KMMCR WHICH IS

PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (Sr.Dn)

AND CJM, SIRA, TUMKURU DISTRICT.

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

O R D E R

Petitioners and counsel remained absent. In spite

of calling the case thrice, there is no representation. It

appears, petitioners are not interested in proceeding

with the case. Therefore, the Petition is dismissed for

non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE

BNV

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top