SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
SRI. BHASKAR G.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/18623/2021



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.NATARAJ

WRIT PETITION No.18623/2021(KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI.BHASKAR G.S.

S/O.LATE.G.B.SHETTAPPA

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

R/AT 9TH BLOCK "C" BLOCK

GUDIBANDE TOWN, GUDIBANDE TALUK

CHIKKABALLAPUR DIST.-562 101

NOW PRESENT AT R/AT

HOUSE NO.8, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS,

PRKRUTHI NAGAR, YELAHANKA

BENGALURU-64.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHEKARAPPA, ADV.)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

THE DEPT. OF REVENUE

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

Dr.AMBEDKAR BEEDHI,

BENGALURU-560 001.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

CHIKKABALLAPURA DIST.,

CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 101.

3.

THE TAHSILDAR

GUDIBANDE TALUK,

CHIKKABALLAPURA DIST.- 562 101.

4.

THE CHIEF OFFICER

GUDIBANDE TOWN PANCHAYATH,

GUDIBANDE TALUK,

CHIKKABALLAPURA DIST.- 562 101.

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. R.SRINIVAS GOWDA, AGA, FOR RESPONDENTS)

2

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS

TO

RESPONDENTS

TO

CONSIDER

AND

DIPOSE

OF

TH

REPRESENTATION, DATED 11.05.2017, GIVEN TO THE TAHSILDA,

GUDIBANDE TALUK, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DATED 08.09.2017 TO

THE TAHSILDAR, GUDIBANDE TALUK, VIDE ANNEXURE-B, GIVEN BY

THE

PETITIONER,

BY

FIXING

OUTER

TIME

LIMIT

AND

CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ‘PRELIMINAY HEARING’

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This petition is filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus

to direct respondent No.3 to conduct survey and fix

boundaries of Survey Nos.89,87, 101 of Gudibande Talulk,

Gudibande.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

that the petitioner is the owner of the aforesaid land and due

to certain disputes between the petitioner and respondent

No.4, the petitioner had filed a representation before the 3rd

respondent on 11.05.2017 requesting them to conduct a

survey and fix the boundaries of the aforesaid land. He

submitted that even after four years, respondent No.4 has

failed to conduct survey and therefore seeks for a direction to

respondent No.3 to conduct survey and fix the boundaries.

3

3.

The learned Government Advocate submitted that

survey of the aforesaid land shall be taken and the limits of

the properties shall be fixed if adequate time is granted.

4.

In view of the above, the following:-

ORDER

1)

Writ petition is allowed. Respondent No.3 is

directed to conduct a survey and to fix the limits of the

aforesaid land within one month from the date of receipt

of a certified copy of this order.

2)

It is needless to mention that respondent

No.3 shall hear and notify all the concerned adjoining

land owners before conducting the survey and fixing of

boundaries.

Sd/-

JUDGE

rsk/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top