IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8279 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
GIRISHA N
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
S/O DUGGAPPA GOWDA
AT NOOJALU HOUSE
NELLURU KEMRAJE VILLAGE
SULLIA TALUK
DAKSHINA KANNADA 574248
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARGAVA D BHAT.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY SULLIA POLICE STATION
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU 560001
2. PADMAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
W/O GIRISHA N
RESIDING AT NOOJALU HOUSE
NELLURU KEMRAJE VILLAGE
SULLIA TALUK
DAKSHINA KANNADA 574248
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.K. KRISHNA KUMAR, HCGP)
CRL.P FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING THAT THIS
HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.7/2022 OF SULLIA P.S., D.K.,
DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376(2)(f), 506 OF IPC AND
SEC.5(n)(n)(l), 6 OF POCSO ACT ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL.
DISTRICT
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
D.K,
MANGALORE
(SPL.C.NO.5011/2022).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by petitioner/accused under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for granting of bail in Crime
No.7/2022 registered by Sullia Police Station, D.K. District
now pending on the file of V Additional District and
Sessions Judge, D.K. Mangaluru (Spl.C.No.5011/2022) for
the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(f), 506 of
IPC and Sections 5(n)(n)(l) and 6 of POCSO Act.
2.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for
the petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader
for the respondent-State
3.
The case of the prosecution is that on complaint
of wife of the petitioner Smt. Padmavathi on 16.01.2022
alleging that she married this petitioner on 21.03.2019
having female child aged 9 months. The accused
suspecting her character and harassing her and he said to
be given sexual assault on the child aged about 9 months
by inserting his finger into the private part of the child.
Due to which there was some bleeding. When she was
taken to the hospital the doctor has not given any
treatment. Therefore she lodged complaint against the
petitioner. After registering the case the police arrested
the petitioner on 17.01.2022 and was remanded to Judicial
Custody. Investigation is completed and charge sheet has
been filed. His bail petition came to be rejected and hence
he is before this Court.
4.
Having heard the arguments addressed by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for
respondent State and perusal of records which reveals that
of course the complainant is the wife of the petitioner and
child, alleged victim is none other than the nine months
child of this petitioner. The allegation is accused is said to
be inserted finger into the vagina of the child and it was
sexual assault as per Sections 4 and 5 of the POCSO Act
as his father. The medical examination report reveals that
there is no injuries on the private part of the child, no
bleedings or seminal stains on the body and the hymen is
also in tact. Such being the case question of sexual assault
on the victim is doubtful at this stage. Investigation has
been completed long back and charge sheet has been
filed. This petitioner is in custody for more than eight
months. He is ready to abide by any conditions.
5.
Therefore,
considering
the
facts
and
circumstances, I am of the view that by imposing certain
stringent conditions if the bail is granted, no prejudice will
be caused to the case of the prosecution. Hence, I pass
the following:
ORDER
The criminal petition is allowed.
The
trial
Court
is
directed
to
release
petitioner/accused on bail in Crime No.7/2022 registered
by Sullia Police Station, D.K. District now pending on the
file of V Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K.
Mangaluru
(Spl.C.No.5011/2022)
for
the
offences
punishable under Sections 376(2)(f), 506 of IPC and
Sections 5(n)(n)(l) and 6 of POCSO Act subject to the
following conditions:-
i)
Petitioner shall execute personal bond for a
sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs
only) with two sureties for likesum to the
satisfaction of the trial Court.
ii)
He strictly shall not indulge in similar type of
offences.
iii)
He shall not tamper with any of the
prosecution witnesses directly or indirectly.
iv)
He shall take the trial without causing any
delay.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
BVK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.