HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
SMT. REVAMMAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/15374/2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION No.15374/2020 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
1.
Smt.Revammam,
Aged about 63 years,
W/o Late Munihanumaiah.
2.
Sri.Mayanna,
Aged about 62 years,
S/o Late Kempanna.
3.
Sri.Nanjappa,
Aged about 47 years,
S/o Late Venkatahanumaiah.
4.
Hanumantharayappa,
Aged about 89 years,
S/o Late Nanjappa.
All are residents of
Muddaiahanapalya Village,
Gidadakonenahalli Dhakale,
Vishwaneedam Post,
Yeshwanthapur Hobli,
Bengaluru – 560072.
…Petitioners
(By Sri.C.M.Nagabhushana, Advocate)
AND:
1.
The State of Karnataka,
Department of Urban Development,
Vikasa Soudha, Dr.Ambedkar Veedhi,
2
Bengaluru – 560001.
Represented by its Secretary.
2.
The Bengaluru Development Authority,
T.Chowdaiah Road,
Kumara Park West Extension,
Bengaluru – 560020.
Represented by its Commissioner.
3.
The Special Land Acquisition Officer,
The Bengaluru Development Authority,
T.Chowdaiah Road,
Kumara Park West Extension,
Bengaluru – 560020.
...Respondents
(By Sri. Y.D.Harsha, AGA for R1
Sri.G.LakshmeeshRao, Advocate for R2 & R3)
This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to allot 8
½ guntas of land in lieu of compensation to the petitioners for
having made use of 8 ½ guntas of land in the petition schedule
property for the formation of the road, and also to pay damages
from making use of the petitioners land from the 2015 till the
date of allotting alternate land.
This Petition coming on for Orders, this day, the Court
made the following:
O R D E R
The petitioners have filed the present writ petition
claiming that they are the absolute owners in possession
and enjoyment of the land bearing Sy.No.12 of the
Gidadakonenahalli
Village,
Yeshwanthapura
Hobli,
Bengaluru North Taluk.
3
2.
It is submitted that their property had been
notified or acquisition by the respondent – BDA and their
only request is that the respondents must be directed to
allot 8 ½ guntas of land in lieu of compensation to the
petitioners for having made use of 8 ½ guntas of land in the
petition schedule property for the formation of road and
also to pay damages from making use of the petitioners
land from 2015 till the date of allotting alternate land.
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent – BDA has filed statement of objections and
paragraph 5 of the said statement of objections reads as
follows:
5.
However, without prejudice to the
aforesaid condition, having regard to the practical
financial
difficulties
faced
by
the
BDA
implementing the directions of the Government in
its letter and spirit in awarding compensation in
respect of the utilization of land, the Bengaluru
Development Authority has forwarded a proposal
to the Government seeking approval to allot 50%
of 50% of developed land i.e., 11,979 sq.ft. per 1
acre of undeveloped land in lieu of utilization of
land of the land owners for formation of roads
without acquisition proceedings on the premise
that the value of developed land of the BDA is
higher in value to 100% of undeveloped land. The
4
State Government approved the said proposal of
the respondent authority vide Communication
dated 09.10.2018 and directed the BDA to take
steps for allotment of 11,979 sq.ft., of land in lieu
of utilization of undeveloped land of 1 acre of
land. Further, the State Government directed the
respondent authority to constitute a committee to
oversee the allotment of alternative sites in cases
where the land is being utilized without acquisition
proceedings.
Accordingly,
the
respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.