HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MR. V ANBALAGAN – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent
MFA/8012/2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
M.F.A. NO. 8012/2016(MV)
BETWEEN:
1.
Mr. V.Anbalagan,
S/o Late. Sri. Vembadi,
Aged about 65 years.
2.
Mrs. Karpagamani,
W/o Sri. V.Anbalagan,
Aged about 56 years.
Both are residing at No.768,
1st Floor, 7th Cross,
Valagerehalli,
Bangalore South Taluk,
Bangalore-560 059. ... Appellants
(By Sri.Chandranath Ariga K., Adv.)
AND:
1.
The Managing Director,
VRL Logistics,
Regd & ADMN Office,
Bangalore Road Varur,
Dharwad, Hubli District-580023.
Karnataka,
Rep. by its Proprietor RC Owner,
2
M.D.VRL Logistics (Ashok Leyland Truck
Bearing KA-25-C-7416).
2.
The Manager,
United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
Divisional Office No.1 & 2,
Enkay Complex,
Hubli-580023.
3.
M/s. Seabird Tourist Center,
No.21, Ananth Arcade,
A.V.Road, Kalasipalyam,
Bangalore-560 002.
Rep. by its proprietor
Sri. Nagarajaiah H.C.
4.
The Manager,
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.,
Rajalakshmi Arcade,
No.228/15, 22nd Cross,
9th Main, 3rd Block,
Jayanagar,
Bengalore-560 101. ... Respondents
(By Sri. Aravind M. Neglur, Adv.R1:
Smt. Harini Shivananda. Adv. For R2:
Notice to R3 is dispensed with
v/o dated:29.03.2019
R4 is served)
This M.F.A. is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act
against the Judgment and award dated 29.08.2016 passed in
MVC No.706/2014 on the file of the I Additional Small Causes
Judge & MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH-11), partly allowing the
claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of
compensation.
This M.F.A. coming on for admission through video
conference, this day, H.T.Narendra Prasad J., delivered the
following:
3
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’,
for short) has been filed by the claimants being
aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.8.2016 passed by
the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
2.
Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal
briefly stated are that on 16.12.2013, when the
deceased namely Dr.A Hemavathy was traveling in a bus
bearing Reg. No.KA-01-AA-1372 from Bangalore to
Hubli. When the bus reached near Jogihalli onNH-4, a
lorry bearing registration No.KA-25/C-7416 driven by its
driver at a high speed, in a rash and negligent manner
dashed against the backside of the bus. As a result of
the aforesaid accident, the deceased sustained grievous
injuries and succumbed to the injuries at the spot.
3.
The claimants filed a petition under Section
166 of the Act on the ground that the deceased was
4
working as a Doctor, she completed her MD in Pathology
and she was earning Rs.1,25,000/- per month. Besides
her earnings, she was running a clinic and also working
in private Nursing Homes, thereby she was earning
nearly Rs.1,25,000/- to Rs.1,50,000/- per month. The
claimants who are the dependents have lost their
dependency since they were depending upon the
deceased. The accident has occurred due to the rash
and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry. The
claimants
claimed
compensation
to
the
tune
of
Rs.4,33,00,000/- along with interest. On service of
summons, the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 have filed
written statements in which the averments made in the
petition were denied. It was pleaded that the petition
itself is false and frivolous in the eye of law. It was
further pleaded that the accident was due to the rash
and negligent driving of the driver of the bus. The
manner of accident, avocation, and income of the
deceased was also denied. It was further pleaded that
5
the quantum of compensation claimed by the claimants
is exorbitant. Hence, they
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.