HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
M/S BHUSHAN ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/15654/2020
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.15654 OF 2020(GM-MM-S)
BETWEEN:
M/S BHUSHAN ENTERPRISES
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER
GEORGE ABRAHAM
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
NO. 234, 1ST STAGE
NARAYANA NAGAR
DODDAKALLASANDRA POST - 560 062
KANAKAPURA ROAD
BENGALURU
... PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. RAVINDRA GAJANAN KOLLE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 001
2 . THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT FO COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
VIKASA SOUDAH
BENGALURU
BENGALURU - 560 001
3 . THE DIRECTOR AND COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
KHANIJA BHAVAN
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
- 2 -
4 . THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETRY
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 001
5 . THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
S3 AND S3A, ZILLADALITHA BHAVANA
2ND FLOOR, KUMBARAHALLI, KOLAR
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 103
6 . THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
O/O THE DCF, KOLAR DIVISION
BANGARPET ROAD, KOLAR
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101
7 . THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
KARNATAKA FOREST DEPARTMENT
ARANYA BHAVAN
18TH CROSS
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU - 560 003
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI. I.TARANATH POOJARY,AGA)
---
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
DIRECT TO QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE ENDORSEMENT
DATED:18.11.2020
AND
FOREST
OPINION/NOC
DATED:03.11.2020 RESPECTIVELY ISSUED BY R-5 SENIOR
GEOLOGIST AND 6TH RESPONDENT DEPUTY CONSERVATOR
OF
FOREST
PRODUCED
AT
ANNEXURE-A
AND
C
RESPECTIVELY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE
MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Notice for final disposal was issued on the earlier date.
- 3 -
2.
The petitioner was granted a quarrying lease for
ordinary building stone under the provisions of the Karnataka
Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 (for short ‘the said
Rules’). The lease was for a period of ten years. The petitioner
sought for deemed extension of lease in terms of sub-rule (4)
of Rule 8-A of the said Rules as amended with effect from 12th
August 2016. The challenge in this writ petition under Article
226 of the Constitution of India is to Annexures-A and C.
Annexure-C is the letter addressed by the Deputy Conservator
of Forest to the Senior Geologist in which it is stated that the
radius of 10 Kms. from the Wildlife Sanctuary shall be
considered as a "Default Eco-Sensitive Zone". In terms of the
said letter, an endorsement dated 18th November 2020 at
Annexure-A has been issued stating that the site of the lease
subject matter of this writ petition is at a distance of 7.40 kms.
from the Kamasandra Wildlife Sanctuary (for short 'the said
Wildlife Sanctuary') and therefore, it is falling within the "Default
Eco-Sensitive Zone" of width of 10 Kms. It is further stated that
the deemed extension for the lease will be processed after
producing
No
Objection
Certificates
from
the
various
departments and after obtaining prior approval of the Standing
Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.
- 4 -
3.
The submission of the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner made on the last date was based on what is
held by the Apex Court in Paragraph 50 of the decision in the
case of Goa Foundation vs Union of India and others1. He
would submit that the concept of "Default Eco-sensitive Zone"
is not known to law.
4.
The learned Additional Government Advocate
relied upon the order dated 4th December 2016 in W.P.No.460
of 2004 passed by the Apex Court. He relied on the Official
Memorandum dated 8th Augus