SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI P.SREEDHAR REDDY – Appellant
Versus
Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike – Respondent
WP/15609/2020



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA

WRIT PETITION No.15609/2020 (LB-BMP)

BETWEEN

SRI P.SREEDHAR REDDY

S/O P.VENKU REDDY

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.25, 1ST MAIN

HGH LAYOUT, BEHIND CBI OFFICE

GANGANAGARA, BENGALURU – 560 032.

... PETITIONER

(BY SRI M.S.BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE (VIDEO CONFERENCING))

AND

1.

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

N R SQUARE, BENGALURU – 560 001.

2.

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

OF TOWN PLANNING (EAST)

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE

UTILITY BUILDING, MAYO HALL

22ND FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.

3.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001.

2

4.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

VIKASA SOUDHA

BENGALURU – 560 001.

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SREENIDHI V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;

SRI NITHYANANDA K.R., HCGP FOR R3 & R4))

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) CALL FOR RECORDS

PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED DEMAND NOTICE DTD 21.12.2020

ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND 2 VIDE ANNX-E;

b) QUASH THE IMPUGNED DEMAND NOTICE DTD 21.12.2020

ISSUED BY THE R-2 IN SO FAR AS DEMAND OF LICENSE FEE OF

RS.7,37,682,

RS.5,19,472

TOWARDS

GROUND

RENT,

RS.27,13,458/- TOWARDS THE BETTERMENT FEE FOR SITE AREA,

RS.6,10,000/-

TOWARDS

LABOUR

CESS

AND

RS.1,02,106/-

TOWARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES ON LABOUR CESS IS

CONCERNED VIDE ANNX-E AND ETC.,

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Heard Sri M.S.Bhagwat, learned counsel appearing for

petitioner, Sri.V.Sreenidhi, learned counsel appearing for

respondent Nos.1 and 2 - BBMP and Sri.Nithyananda.K.R.,

learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent Nos.3

and 4.

3

2. This petition calls in question the very same issues that

were called in question in W.P.No.4601/2020 and connected cases.

3. The batch of petitions are disposed of by an order dated

04.08.2021. In the light of identical issues, this writ petition is

also disposed following the order passed in W.P.No.4601/2020

and connected cases decided on 04.08.2021.

In view of the disposal of the main petition, I.A.No.1/2020

does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

nvj

CT:MJ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top