- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:36050
CRL.P No. 7759 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7759 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
HULUGABHOVI @ ULGABHOVI
S/O DODDEER BHOVI,
AGED 53 YEARS
R/O KENCHAPPANAHALLI, VADDARAHATTI
VADDARAHATTI POST, BUKKAPATNA HOBLI,
SIRA TALUKA, DIST. TUMKURU-572137.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.T.BIKKANNAVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY KALLAMBELLA POLICE STATION
SIRA TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572125.
(REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVT. PLEADER)
BANGALORE-01.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. SOWMYA R., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 CR.PC PRAYING TO GRANT
ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO HIM AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT
POLICE TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS
ARREST IN CR.NO.88/2023 FOR ALLEGED OFFENCE U/S 120B,
302, 201 R/W 34 OF IPC, REGISTERED BY KALLAMBELLA
POLICE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT, PENDING ON THE
FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Digitally
signed by
VANDANA S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:36050
CRL.P No. 7759 of 2023
Accused No.3 in Crime No.88/2023 registered by the
Kallambella Police Station, Tumakuru, for the offences
punishable under Sections 120B, 302, 201 r/w 34 of IPC is
before this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3.
On the basis of the complaint dated 13.05.2023
lodged by the petitioner herein, FIR in Crime No.88/2023
was registered by Kallambella Police Station, Tumakuru,
for the offences punishable under Sections 149 and 306 of
IPC against Puttaiah and five others. In the complaint
dated 13.05.2023, the petitioner had averred that his son
Manjunatha was married to Sowbhagya, who is the
daughter of Puttaiah. The marriage between Manjunatha
and Sowbhagya had failed and therefore, she had filed a
petition claiming maintenance before the jurisdictional
Court. When the case was pending, Puttaiah and his son
had
assaulted
Manjunatha
and
a
case
in
Crime
No.187/2022
was
registered
against
them.
Since,
- 3 -
Manjunatha had not paid the maintenance awarded by the
jurisdictional Court he was remanded to custody for the
period from 06.04.2023 to 06.05.2023 and thereafter,
subsequently, he was released.
4.
The
petitioner
allegedly
had
thereafter
approached
Puttaiah
and
his
family
members
for
settlement of the dispute between Manjunatha and
Sowbhagya. At that time, Puttaiah and others had
allegedly
abused
and
assaulted
Manjunatha.
On
12.05.2023, Manjunatha had left the house at about
09.00 A.M. and he had not returned. His mobile phone
was found switched of. Thereafter, on the next day at
about 06.00 A.M., petitioner found the dead body of his
son near his property in a drainage. On verification,
petitioner found that his son had died and near his body
he also found an empty poison bottle. It is in this
background he had approached the police and lodged the
complaint against Puttaiah and his family members and
FIR in Crime No.88/2023 was therefore registered by
- 4 -
Kallambella Police Station initially against Puttaiah and his
family members for offences punishable under Sections
149 and 306 of IPC. During the course of investigation in
the said case, Sowbhagya wife of Manjunatha, who was
arrayed as accused No.3 in the FIR in Crime No.88/2023
had appeared before the police on 06.06.2023 and had
stated that she suspected the hands of the petitioner and
one Raju in the death of her husband. The police on
10.06.2023 had summoned Raju, who is now arrayed as
accused No.1 in the case and he allegedly confessed about
murdering Manjunatha with the help of accused No.2 at
the instance of accused No.3. The police thereafter have
arrested accused Nos.1 and 2 and had filed a remand
application on 11.06.2023 with the prayer to array
petitioner as accused No.3 in Crime No.88/2023. It is
under these circumstances, the petitioner apprehended
arrest in the case and had filed Crl.Misc.No.1027/2023
before the Court of I Addl. District & Sessions Judge,
Tumakuru,
which
was
dismissed
on
26.07.2023.
Therefore, he is before this Court.
- 5 -
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
except the confession statement of accused Nos.1 and 2,
there is no material to connect the petitioner to the crime.
He submits that the death note and the video recording
left behind by the deceased Manjunatha would clearly go
to show that he had committed suicide as a result of
harassment made out on him by his wife and her family
members. He accordingly prays to allow the petition.
6.
Per contra, learned HCGP has opposed the bail
application. She submits that investigation in the case is
under
progress
and
custodial
interrogation
of
the
petitioner is very much required and accordingly, prays to
dismiss the petition.
7.
The dead body of deceased Manjunatha was
found by the complainant near his property on 13.05.2023
at about 06.00 A.M. and besides the dead body, he also
found an empty bottle of poison. From the body of the
deceased Manjunatha, a death note written by him was
also recovered wherein he h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.