PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI.B.V. DHARMENDRA BABU – Appellant
Versus
B.D. RATHNAMMA – Respondent
Petitioner, impleading applicant in O.S.No.273/2022 to
come on record as additional defendant is before this Court
aggrieved by the rejection of application filed by him under
Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC to come on record as additional
defendant in the above stated suit.
Heard learned counsel Sri. Mahabaleshwara Rao for
the petitioner at length and perused the petition papers.
The suit is one for partition and possession of the
suit schedule properties. Learned counsel for the petitioner
would submit that the defendants in the suit have remained
absent and they are placed exparte. In the said circumstances,
the petitioner filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of
CPC to come on record as additional defendant in the above
stated suit. Learned counsel would submit that respondent No.3
herein who is defendant No.2 before the trial court executed
agreement dated 10.05.2013 agreeing to sell suit schedule
item No.1 of 'B' schedule property. It is also stated in the
agreement that defendant No.2 has received Rs.10.00 lakhs
out of the total sale consideration of Rs.11.00 lakhs. Learned
- 4 -
counsel would submit that since defendant No.2 has executed
agreement to sell in favour
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.