HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
RAYAN FERNANDES – Respondent
MFA/7279/2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
MFA.NO.7279 OF 2016(MV-I)
C/W
MFA.NO.7110 OF 2016(MV-I)
IN MFA.NO.7279 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
M/S. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
VISHNU PRAKASH BUILDING
COURT ROAD, UDUPI
THROUGH ITS REGIONAL OFFICE
2ND FLOOR, SUMANGALA COMPLEX
LAMINGTON ROAD
HUBLI - 580 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER
....APPELLANT
(BY SRI. B.S. UMESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . RAYAN FERNANDES
S/O FELIX FERNANDES
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R
2
RESIDING AT "FERNANDES VILLA"
MUDAR VILLAGE
POST BAJAGOLI, KARKALA TALUK
UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 122
2 . MOHAMMED FAISAL
S/O SHEIK MOHAMMAD IQBAL
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
RESIDING AT YUSUF COMPOUND
IN FRONT OF SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE
SHIRVA VILLAGE
UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 574 116
….RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. UMESH MULIMANI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R1, V/O DATED
16.01.2020 NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 08.07.2016 PASSED
IN MVC NO.230/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT
JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, UDUPI, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF
RS. 22,77,400/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF
PETITION TILL REALIZATION.
IN MFA.NO.7110 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAYAN FERNANDES
S/O FELIX FERNANDES
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
RESIDING AT "FERNANDES VILLA"
MUDAR VILLAGE
POST BAJAGOLI KARKALA TALUK
UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 102
....APPELLANT
3
(BY SRI. UMESH MULIMANI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . SRI MOHAMMED FAISAL
S/O SHEIK MOHAMMAD IQBAL
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
RESIDING AT YUSUF COMPOUND
IN FRONT OF SAINT MARRY'S COLLEGE
SHIRVA VILLAGE
UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 576 101
2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
M/S. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
VISHNU PRAKASH BUILDING
COURT ROAD, UDUPI-576 101
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER
….RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.S. UMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2,
NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 08.07.2016 PASSED
IN MVC NO.230/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT
JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, UDUPI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
JUDGMENT ON 08.12.2020, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
JUDGMENT
THIS
DAY,
SACHIN
SHANKAR
MAGADUM J.,
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
JUDGMENT
The captioned appeals are directed against the judgment
and award dated 8.7.2010 passed in MVC.No.230/2010 by the
Principal
District
Judge
and
Member,
MACT,
Udupi.
MFA.No.7279/2016 is filed by the Insurance Company
questioning false implication of the rider of the bike by the
first respondent-claimant with the connivance of the second
respondent-owner of the bike, whereas the claimant has
referred MFA.No.7110/2016 seeking enhancement.
2.
For the sake of convenience, the parties are
referred to as per their rank before the Tribunal.
3.
The facts leading to the filing of the above appeals
are as under:
The claimant filed a claim petition claiming compensation
of Rs.51 lakhs with interest at 12% p.a. The claimant
specifically contended in the claim petition that on 24.9.2008
at about 10.15 p.m., he was walking by the side of the road
5
and when he reached Bhajanakatte- Bommarabettu, Udupi
Taluk, a motor cycle bearing Regn.No.KA-20/V-1137 came
from the hind side in a rash and negligent manner to the
extreme side of the road and dashed against the cement drain
and thereafter dashed against him, as a result of the same
claimant fell down and sustained grievous injuries. Claimant
was immediately shifted to Kamath Nursing H